- Messages
- 3,756
- Name
- Guy
- Edit My Images
- No
That's the issue. A Wedding full of head, or head and shoulder shots would be rather dull and as pointed out earlier they could be taken anywhere.
I'd disagree about a 70-200 not getting any better for candids, I don't understand why its thought that you need to be a distance away for a good candid, act like you're meant to be there and build a rapport and trust with the guests, they'll soon start behaving naturally without the need for 200mm.
70 mm is far to long for most group shots, and although you don't need to cover the entire building on every shot then the most interesting shots and the ones with a real wow factor will have context to them (for the most part).
Agreed - my earlier post said the same thing:
'I'm going to go against the grain - I don't like using a 70-200 for candids at a wedding. I find guests think they're being spied on and it's easy to lose trust. I use mine for some B&G shots when we're alone and that's it. Otherwise it's always a 50mm or 24-70. I get in close amongst the guests and work hard in there. I'm really not a fan of long distance head shots that don't show context.'
But then I don't consider myself a candid-shooter.
