- Messages
- 11,274
- Name
- Asha
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Ok this is going to be a seriously slow and long learning curve ...... but fun
In the heat of 32 in the shade
of last weeks heatwave i decided to have a play in the garden and just take two shots with a puposeful learning exercise in mind.
I have done no retouch other than a light sharpening to compensate for the scanning.
The fact they are not actually equivalent to 5x4 dimensions is because my scanner won't scan the whole neg ...no big deal atm as this is all "practice" time, similarly dust removal etc is not a priority.
Anyhow onto the shots.
The first one simply shot with all settings as neutral ( ie no shift, tilt etc) therefore all focal planes parallel.
The purpose of this shot was, after reading upon how to set hyperfocal distances using the aperture scale on the rear standard, to see if I could actually render a shot "all in focus" ....The idea was to have all from the nearby stones of the wall the the mountains in the distance "in focus".
Shot at F/22, I think it's OK
The second one was a play with front tilt, rise and swing.
The primary aim was to focus on the "ASTRAL" tin ( which I look to have missed the focus and got the tin behind) and isolate it from it's surroundings, thus rendering the rest of the shot OOF
As I type this, I actually cannot remember exactly what movement did/ does what but i did some reading prior to attempting this shot as to just blunder about will teach me nothing.
Anyway it was shot as follows:
F/8
Front rise: 8mm
Front forward tilt: 19°
Front right swing 5°
Naturally I don't expect anyone to take a lot of notice of those figures, I have simply posted them for reference.
However altough the desired effect was nearly there, i would like to know what, if anything I could have done to have put the stones of the wall ( bottom left ) and the bush ( middle right) aloso OOF whilst leaving the tins in focus?
It appears that I have achieved a diagnol line of focus through the bottom third of the frame.
Perhaps I needed some movement of the rear standard??....Or perhaps what i was after achieving simply isn't possible
The time it is going to take up learning, using and enjoying this gear could easily become detrimental to shooting other formats!!
Anyway, any comments, advice etc will be appreciated as always.
Be gentle though cos i am a beginner!
:nailbiting: 
View attachment 14382
View attachment 14383
I'll likely keep adding to this thread as i go along and see if i can improve and master the creativity I have in mind
with the help and knowledge from you guys. 
In the heat of 32 in the shade
I have done no retouch other than a light sharpening to compensate for the scanning.
The fact they are not actually equivalent to 5x4 dimensions is because my scanner won't scan the whole neg ...no big deal atm as this is all "practice" time, similarly dust removal etc is not a priority.
Anyhow onto the shots.
The first one simply shot with all settings as neutral ( ie no shift, tilt etc) therefore all focal planes parallel.
The purpose of this shot was, after reading upon how to set hyperfocal distances using the aperture scale on the rear standard, to see if I could actually render a shot "all in focus" ....The idea was to have all from the nearby stones of the wall the the mountains in the distance "in focus".
Shot at F/22, I think it's OK
The second one was a play with front tilt, rise and swing.
The primary aim was to focus on the "ASTRAL" tin ( which I look to have missed the focus and got the tin behind) and isolate it from it's surroundings, thus rendering the rest of the shot OOF
As I type this, I actually cannot remember exactly what movement did/ does what but i did some reading prior to attempting this shot as to just blunder about will teach me nothing.
Anyway it was shot as follows:
F/8
Front rise: 8mm
Front forward tilt: 19°
Front right swing 5°
Naturally I don't expect anyone to take a lot of notice of those figures, I have simply posted them for reference.
However altough the desired effect was nearly there, i would like to know what, if anything I could have done to have put the stones of the wall ( bottom left ) and the bush ( middle right) aloso OOF whilst leaving the tins in focus?
It appears that I have achieved a diagnol line of focus through the bottom third of the frame.
Perhaps I needed some movement of the rear standard??....Or perhaps what i was after achieving simply isn't possible
The time it is going to take up learning, using and enjoying this gear could easily become detrimental to shooting other formats!!
Anyway, any comments, advice etc will be appreciated as always.
Be gentle though cos i am a beginner!
View attachment 14382
View attachment 14383
I'll likely keep adding to this thread as i go along and see if i can improve and master the creativity I have in mind
