MaddyZangles
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 262
- Name
- Maddy Rogers
- Edit My Images
- Yes
When l saw her at the weekend to drool over the 40D she did have a UV filter on her 1.2.
i didn't resize unless photobucket does automatically??
what is the best size to go for??
it was very dark so uped the exp was that wrong??
Not necessarily
Dark where?
Have you tried spot metering?
Do you have a grey card?
Have you adjusted the white balance?
Thanks for your posts on the clipping Cedric. Very interesting. I've got another question, which addresses the apparent fact that this effect does not appear in all images at f/1.2. I also note your other comments about how focusing distance and other things impact on this, but I wonder how this lens works on a 5DMk2?
Clearly, the original 5D is similarly affected (as used for the tests in your link) to your 50D but I recall one user saying (on another site) that his 50 1.2 was poor at focus shift on a 1Ds, but this disappeared on a 5DMk2. I'm not sure what's going on there, but maybe if Canon has fixed the focus shift in firmware (ie it knows the focusing distance and aperture and refocuses before exposure) then maybe they have addressed the mirror box issue? Not a format thing of course, but one of camera design.
Apologies, but these things intrigue me. And if I'm honest, despite my earlier remarks, I don't think these things detract from such an amazing lens. It's just got a bit of character![]()
No need to apoligise mate, but unfortunately I can't really answer your question. At some stage I want to get around to using it on the EOS 3 which should be interesting though.
Canon Bob has a 5DMK2 though and the lens I'm pretty sure, so he's your man to ask.
that it some quite serious kit to be starting out with !
Yes, but if you can wield a 1.2 to good effect then you'll get great results.

Im sure thats true. i am just jealous![]()
Well if you evere decide to sell, I'd pay 750£ for the lens in a heartbeat.
Seriously. PM if interested.
