Too many throwaway snapshots.
Numbers 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 cannot be classed as 'great photographs'. Especially number 26??? It's a weather station photo for Gods sake.
Best for me is the very last one.
Too many throwaway snapshots.
Numbers 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 cannot be classed as 'great photographs'. Especially number 26??? It's a weather station photo for Gods sake.
Best for me is the very last one.
Too many throwaway snapshots.
Numbers 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 cannot be classed as 'great photographs'. Especially number 26??? It's a weather station photo for Gods sake.
Best for me is the very last one.
A photo from space is still a photo. The title is Most Powerful, not most technically beautiful or something. Irene was a huge and rare event, that fortunately didn't end up as bad as it was first predicted. That makes it quite a powerful photo.
Same goes for most of the other shots you've listed. If you don't recognise the significance of the moments pictured, did you read the captions?
Still, very US centric as said above.
38 was in the Reuters spread also, why this is a good shot is beyond me, it may as well be a dead fox in the street being shot on a mobile phone. ... Pointless shot, no context, no story nothing but the fanciful ideas of the publisher just because it a bloody ipad in some desert. ...so what!
well, i think the point is the penetration of technology and its use.
Obviously Joe yes ...Some aid worker got an Ipad...wow.![]()
If it had been a Masai Warrior it might have made the grade.
you can simplify it like that if you like.
Or you could see it the way I suggested. each to their own.
I just agreed with you view by saying 'yes obviously' :shrug:
Its not your suggestion Joe ...its the photographers.![]()
my suggestiion was how to interpret the image, you gave the impression that you don't think it did that very well given by the smilie and the next sentence.
or have I interpreted what you are saying incorrectly and you do feel that it conveys the message well?
Yes I think you have. I agree with the photographers intended story to convey the message, and yes it does work I agree.
But for me its just a bit weak, and not at all a powerful photograph. It would have conveyed the same message much more strongly if the guy had been say, a Masai Warrior.

thats true, although there may not be a masai warrior in the world who owns an ipad![]()
![]()
Though Id just have a quick Google for one just in case ...close but not yet. damn!
![]()
Some don't affect me in the same way as others - the shot of Obama and crew as Bin Laden is being tracked doesn't do anything for me, neither does the phone hanging off the hook in Wall Street - but there are some brilliant moments captured; the boy kissing his girl, the couple sat on their steps and the dust storm in Arizona.
But nonetheless, it shows how moments that are relevant to us as individuals can be captured. Also, the context of each shot helps massively to give deeper insight into what/where/why/who/when etc....
Some don't affect me in the same way as others - the shot of Obama and crew as Bin Laden is being tracked doesn't do anything for me, neither does the phone hanging off the hook in Wall Street - but there are some brilliant moments captured; the boy kissing his girl, the couple sat on their steps and the dust storm in Arizona.
But nonetheless, it shows how moments that are relevant to us as individuals can be captured. Also, the context of each shot helps massively to give deeper insight into what/where/why/who/when etc....
It's funny that, for me, this told an interesting story and made me think "the bloke sitting quietly in the corner is the most powerful man in the world and he is sitting watching a live feed of the most wanted man in the world being executed on his orders". Photographically speaking of course, it's just a snapshot of a load of unremarkable people in a room.
I disagree, it could be any photo of any hurricane from any year, we've all seen loads and they all look a bit like that one, it might be a most powerful thing and very destructive but as for a powerful photo, no, its been seen a million times and It totally needs the statement to have any useful meaning or context.
I agree with Harriers, the same lack of context applies to many of the shots, without the words they're just good snaps. (some of them are excellent, but the majority are lacking for me)
The Reuters thread recently had a similar lacking for me (although that was more about the stories from the photographers as well (and some of them had me in tears)...However too may shots needed the words to make them interesting...
Its like the photo journalist market is now swamped with the average photographer and all the good ones that actually tell the story with the photo have retired.
:shrug:
Maybe I've just become too choosy...
But it isn't. And it hasn't been seen before, well, not for a long time, that's the point.
Documentary photographs need captions and context, otherwise they're pointless and open to interpretation.
There are dozens, most likely more, of world-class photojournalists working today. And most of them put the time, effort and research into their work to be able to present it with supporting text, without which even the best photograph is less powerful and useful than it could be.