Don't get it. Just don't!
It's a crappy digi camera in a possibly-light-tight box. It might work ok for black and white, and possibly for some slide film (although you'll almost certainly hit problems). But it has no idea of the orange masks for the different types of colour negative film. The one I bought had light leaks, and the general quality was abysmal.
Look for a scanner that runs attached to your computer with a USB connection (some older ones use SCSI that can be a problem these days). I bought a Plustek 7500i that works very well, although I can't use the expensive (and hard to use) Silverfast software any more, as it won't run on my version of OSX. I use Vuescan Pro instead, which has the advantage that it works with almost any scanner known, including (probably) your all-in-one printer-scanner. In the case of the 7500i, the i refers to an infreared channel that can help remove dust and scratches automatically. Reflecta also do a well-respected range, slightly more expensive? Both of these are dedicated 35mm scanners.
There is also a range of scanners that do both 35mm and 120 (and possibly 4*5 LF); these are flatbeds, and the main ones around are the Epson V500 and V700. They have slightly lower resolution than the dedicated 35mm scanners.
One thing to remember is that most quote resolutions are meaningless; some parts of the system can reach those resolutions, but the optics and filters tend to be limiting factors. It's pretty hard to get a resolution much above 2400 dpi from consumer scanners, and often for that you have to scan at a nominal 6400 dpi or above, giving you huge bloated scans. There's a German site that does actual tests with standard targets that will give you better info. OTOH 2400 dpi on a 6*9 (cm) negative is about 30+ mpixels!
Commercial drum scans are the ultimate in getting everything out of your negatives, but far too expensive for anything other than your very best shots that you want to print big.
