.

How exactly do these show the passing of time? whats the 24 hour bit about, was it a 24 hour exposure or what.
 
Absolutely meaningless to me.
 
Ok I have got it now, it seems the OP has taken a series of images over the time period and blended them together. Sadly it doesn't work for me, some just look flat and some of the skys are blown, I suspect a well done HDR would have produced a better looking image.
My 2p worth.
 
I was rather expecting a series over a period of time. An interesting idea though.
 
The best photos IMO showing the changing of time are by Sergey Larenkov (Google him) who has produced some stunning and very clever images where WW2 meets present day.

I agree though an interesting idea...
 
Sorry but that is not my cup of tea at all, I don't really 'get it' and the images are not of a good standard as said above.

Also agree on the WW2 shots being great.

Perhaps a nice idea but better execution needed.
 
I can't figure out how any of them could be a 24 or 1 hour exposures... surely the clouds and the animals would move more in an hour...
 
i don't get it.

Even if took several pics across the course of a day - i'd expect some serious changes in light (from loads to hardly any!)
 
there was me thinking hes just trying to drive traffic to his site...
 
matty said:
there was me thinking hes just trying to drive traffic to his site...
Click to expand...

Chuckle, like every other one of his posts. Nice re direct as well........
 
Rolyratman said:
The best photos IMO showing the changing of time are by Sergey Larenkov (Google him) who has produced some stunning and very clever images where WW2 meets present day.

I agree though an interesting idea...
Click to expand...

I remember those shots. I agree very clever.
 
I was looking for more idea's tbh, I guess it's easy to critise to work you don't understand also it's hard to take in the full effect of the images on screen the prints are a metre wide and doing extremely well.
 
ooh and the way it works are when the images are taken to create the panorama they are taken in intervals with some being in the space of an hour from ledft to right and some 24 hours so you can see how time effects the landscape.
 
Hi Thomas.
Are these exhibited anywhere we can see the larger image? I'll agree some shots look better printed large.

As with all new ideas, it might take a while to understand the process, its just that its difficult to understand how this 'shows' time. There's no movement, or difference in levels of light that you'd get over 24 hours.

How would this technique of yours transfer to other pictures, perhaps like a cityscape?
 
By the way, I like your demo pics. Interesting processing and good composition.
 
Thomas Comery said:
ooh and the way it works are when the images are taken to create the panorama they are taken in intervals with some being in the space of an hour from ledft to right and some 24 hours so you can see how time effects the landscape.
Click to expand...

So the panos are taken starting at one end, take shot, wait a while, take next shot etc etc? They are not taken as a complete pano at different times and blended. Are you processing the image before compositing in a pano?
 
I just had a look at the Sergey Larenkov pictures, those are fantastic.

Strangely for me when I click the OP's link it just opens TP again in another window? :thinking:
 
There is a 180 pano shot in my local hospital of the view from the hospital tower, about 10foot long. As you walk past it, it starts off daytime and gets later and later during the day. Its a series of shots taken over a 24 hour period and then stitched together, and this is what I was expecting with these, but I really dont see it sorry.
 
gazfy said:
I just had a look at the Sergey Larenkov pictures, those are fantastic.

Strangely for me when I click the OP's link it just opens TP again in another window? :thinking:
Click to expand...

Its called mod intervention!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top