200-400 + 1.7tc test shots.

Richard Peters

Suspended / Banned
Messages
1,323
Edit My Images
No
Went to a newly discovered local nature reserve on sunday. Not the greatest weather so thought it would be good to scout it out. Did a few test shoots with the 200-400 combined with the 1.7tc in between it raining. Might be useful for anyone with this lens who is thinking about getting a TC for it - it'll either give you the confidence to get one or confirm you shouldn't depending on how you look at this lol

These were hand held from a hide:

1/500, f8, ISO 2000, 650mm

chick.jpg


%100 crop

chick_crop1.jpg


And same, but sharpened

chick_crop1s.jpg


No usm

chick_crop2.jpg


usm

chick_crop2s.jpg


No usm

chick_crop3.jpg


usm

chick_crop3s.jpg


1/800, f8, ISO 2000, 650mm

wasp.jpg


no usm

wasp_crop1.jpg


usm

wasp_crop1s.jpg


This for me was a worse case scenario for this combo with poor light and hand held at high ISO but I 'think' with more favourable conditions (proper sunlight, lower ISO, decent support) it would pass in an emergency.
 
Interesting results Richard, I wonder what they would be like if the setup was hung on a 393 head?
 
The 100% crops are horribly grainy at ISO 2000, Richard. I can't help the feeling that we're not really seeing the lens in its best light, so to speak.
 
The 100% crops are horribly grainy at ISO 2000, Richard. I can't help the feeling that we're not really seeing the lens in its best light, so to speak.
:suspect: are you serious? Its ISO 2000, grain is to be expected...especially when sharpened up on a %100 crop.

However, this wasn't a demonstration of the D3's ISO (there are plenty of tests for that out there). If you read at the bottom of my first post I said this was a worst case scenario test to see how the combination would perform, obviously these are not optimum conditions, this was about seeing what you can get away with in an emergency - and I think it shows it would work quite well in more favourable conditions.
 
Back
Top