Recent content by woollyback

That's a great advert for the camera and what lovely writing and images

Thanks Kev for posting these up - they look great. More pondering as to which is best :shrug::shrug::shrug::shrug:

Rick - that may well be the key issue :):))

holty, just a happy snapper mate - will never be a pro :)

Thats a beauty - just muddies the water even more :). Thanks for posting :)

Mike - same for me mate :)

Agree - its the flexibility of the zoom that attracts me, but I too would want to use it with a TC or 2

Gaz, I tried the 500 mk1 and for me it was just too heavy to be portable for the type of shooting I like. But you are correct - native length will alwaays win over TC's

Pete, Completely agree its all about the lights but OMG your images are amazing :)

yep I agree I need to try both, just need to find somewhere that has them. I think ergonomics are important on these type of lenses so looks like a trip to WEX. I think I want a 300 but it has to be 3x better for the price and am not sure for me it will be thanks for the inputs Rob

Hello folks, I have almost made my mind up to buy the canon 300 2.8 but at the price of a kidney and the 120-300 sigma seemingly a bargain I would like to try them out side by side. Question is... where in the North East would be best bet. I guess WEX would have both but we are not...

Read through it just now - looks fab. Thanks for taking the time to direct me :) much appreciated:clap::clap:

Thanks both for the comments Az - how did you find the IQ 400 vs 300 with TC Postcard - will have a look ta Rob

Fantastic - thanks for taking the time to reply,. Much appreciated :)

Hello folks, Thinking about the above change, primarily for more length via 1.4 & 2.0TC. Anyone out there done it?, what where your findings other than the obvious weight increase. How was AF, IQ. Sigma seems really cheap for what you get? Cheers for any info:):) Rob