Had a quick glance at lunch and Jpeg would work to an extent.
1. Use JPEG Fine
2. Optimum JPEG quality
3. D-Lighting set to high
4. Use aRGB instead of sRGB
5. Use Lightroom as non-destructing platform
I've been using my D90 since 2010 and I'm not sure I would take much better shots with a D7200. So instead I think I'll treat the old girl to a nice new 16-80 2.8-4 in the new year.
Exactly the reason I shoot RAW. I have a 5 year old son and quick shots are a must as he doesn't hang around. If it's sharp and about 80% correct exposure wise, it can be edited nicely in PS.
I may be being really idiotic but when I open my RAW (NEF) file into CS6 it says layer 0 instead of background like it did in CS5?
I always have to flatten the image before saving to jpeg even though this is the only layer.
:gag:
It's all in the viewing distance.
I've printed many 30x20" prints for people from my old 6mp (3008x2000) D40 with superb results. Ok press our nose against them they're not super sharp but you'll be surprised just how big you can print.
Am I right in saying the BBC will screen half the season live with the other races being covered by extensive highlight programmes? If so that'll do me as I ain't paying for Sky Sports.
I have a D90, fantastic camera and superb value for money. Ok it's been replaced by the D7000 but that cost well over £1k and certainly isn't double the camera.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.