Recent content by evilian

i want to do this to mine. so its nice and clean/fresh but i had no windows xp disc with mine. does this mean i cant do it? thanks ian

they are very very good. surley they must be 99% pp ***? ian

tahnsk alot all and thanks tdodd for that. very wel explained, i now understand it a whole lot more:thumbs: i have the original raw file so i might try what you said to see if it help bring some sky detail back ian

thanks Tdodd what is ment when you say clipped pixles? ian

thanks phil. sorry of topic but head over to here and join up if your into your vw and thing, its a awesome forum. ian

yes good shout, never thought of that. was done with evaluative metering. 400D had partial and centre weighted adverage. would one of these maybe been a better choice? thanks ian

hi pete im using a 400D with the 18-55 kit lens. was at F4 and 1/50s. sorry the pic is pretty bad looking at it again but its good for the point im trying to get across. just my skys and whites seem pretty washed out thanlks ian

hi all. im just getting into this togging abd loving it at the mo. seem to be strugling with my skys ***. this is a bit of a snap shot i took earlier. notice how the sky and the white in the van seem washed out. is it just a case of sutter speed to low and letting to much light in? or...

i have the non is version. so i may be interested in a is version if the price is resonable. pm me if anyone is hoing to be moving theres on:thumbs: thanks ian

also looking at the canon IS 70-300mm. reviews seem good and can be had for a good price if you hang around. i was originally looking at the Sigma 70-300 APO but wanted IS. there dosnt seem to be anything in between the sigma lens and the canon one also with IS. if anyone knows of a 300mm zoom...

sorry. its for a canon (400d) thanks ian

hi all just wondering if there was a image stabilization version of this popular lens? if not is there something similar available that is not going to cost an arm and a leg. would be looking at spending no more than £250 second hand but nearer 200 would be better *** thanks for your...

has anybody got any examle shots with one of these in use. maybe a photo at 200mm and the same pic with the tele converter used. thanks ian

just picking up this old thread. how much less would a 250mm's reach be than a 300mm lens any examples? thanks alot ian

im in the uk. was just that it popped up on dollars first so just quoted that thanks ian