World Press Photo of the Year

Keltic Ice Man

Glossary King
Suspended / Banned
Messages
3,179
Name
Allan
Edit My Images
Yes
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/09022007/325/photo/world-press-photo-year-2006.html

3393758124.jpg


World Press Photo of the Year 2006 shows young Lebanese driving through a devastated neighborhood of South Beirut August 15, 2006. The prize-winning entries were announced on February 9, 2007.


So what do you think?
 
Load of pants if you ask me! :razz:

I can see the comical oh whats gone off here, oh the whole place is all blown up?
But I'm sure there are better things than this, maybe I'm wrong? though I have just finished a bottle of white to myself so my judgement will be slightly impaired!
 
Load of pants if you ask me! :razz:

I can see the comical oh whats gone off here, oh the whole place is all blown up?
But I'm sure there are better things than this, maybe I'm wrong? though I have just finished a bottle of white to myself so my judgement will be slightly impaired!

Nope. Your ability to drive might be impaired, but your occular judgement is spot on. It is pants.
 
Why are these things alway won by images of misery and doom? :thumbsdown:

Sorry but its all getting a bit... "so what?" :thinking:
 
:agree: with the man himself, a couple of these kinds of 'Comps' have been won with complete and utter crap, to be truthful!
 
Looks like there was very little competition. And this is the best?

" The Associated Press won a total of six awards, while five went to Reuters. Getty Images, which has been pushing into news, sports and entertainment photography, won four awards.

The Amsterdam-based World Press Photo organisation said that more than 78,000 images were submitted by 4,460 photographers from 124 countries.

Winner Platt will receive his award of 10,000 euros ($12,990) at an awards ceremony in Amsterdam in April."
 
10,000 euros? for that?!!

For god's sake. Don't want to sound big-headed but I've taken better photos myself! In fact I've thrown better shots away!
 
It's another case of substance over style. With photography, (for me ) it's all about the what the picture does to you on an emotional level and this does very little until you know the story behind it, which kind of defeats the whole object imho.
 
Thought I'd wait a bit and see what others said...

For my own 2 peneth, I think it's all kinds of ace - a well deserved win.
 
Thats total rubbish both image wise and technically. look at the buildings.

If you want to see some real good and moving press shots then take a look at the readers choice of the MSNBC images of 2005
http://msnbc.com/modules/yip05/dw.asp?nStartOn=2

Now! thats real skill and art but be warned, every time I look at these pictures I start to question how good my own pictures are in comparison
 
Thought I'd wait a bit and see what others said...

For my own 2 peneth, I think it's all kinds of ace - a well deserved win.

I've tried, but I'm just not seeing it as amazing. Maybe I don't know enough about the situation for it to have the desired impact.
 
If that won I would hate to see the runners up :thinking:
 
I too thought I'd wait and see the general view. I check a number of sources to make sure this was the winner, as to my mind - yep its a pic of a situation, but I personally didn't think it was the best pic of a year.

I often look at reuters and other newsfeeds and I'm sure many other pictures show situations in a far better composed or more interesting manner.

If this pic was in my paper I don't think i'd look twice (well maybe at the lady in the front seat :D :love: )
 
Thats total rubbish both image wise and technically. look at the buildings.

If you want to see some real good and moving press shots then take a look at the readers choice of the MSNBC images of 2005
http://msnbc.com/modules/yip05/dw.asp?nStartOn=2

Now! thats real skill and art but be warned, every time I look at these pictures I start to question how good my own pictures are in comparison

Got to agree Old Man, there are some stunning images on there, I'm going to go back later and have another look.

As for the photo that started this thread I see nothing special about it, technically it looks like a snap and is certainly not worthy of the accolade.
 
Part of the problem is the size is a little too small for such an active image - slightly larger version here.
There's an awful lot going on, but for all the right reasons - this is no quick unthought snapshot, although the 'tog would have undoubtedly had a sliver of a moment to nab the shot.
The two guys in the right are making calls - what has just happened? Which member of their family is dead or without an arm?
The guy walking past is shooting a glance at the destruction we can't see - but that's all it is, he's not stopping to look, and while his expression shows a little disgust, there's nothing he hasn't seen before - the guy behind him seems to be doing the same.
The guy at the left of the frame and the woman walking are just going about their daily business - the destruction & carnage is lost to them. Get on with your lives or give up now.
Despite all the rubble and remains in the background, no-one is actively looking at it - it either doesn't interest them or there's stuff that's far worse the other way. Further back the flat complex shows signs of being lived in, despite being in what is a) clearly an obscenely dangerous place to be & b) likely having questionable structural integrity. Why would people still live in those conditions? Do they have no other choice, or do they refuse to leave?
The reflection in the car gives us a smidge of an idea of what's going on behind - the city is flattened.
Why does the front left woman in the car have a cloth to her face? The smell? Of what? Rotting flesh or raw sewrage? Or perhaps she's just plain gagging at the sight of what she can see.
The woman looking at her phone? Did she just take a snap of the carnage, and still finds it hard to look at even on the phone screen? Or perhaps she just got a message, she isn't going to see her younger brother who lives in the lower city again... Perhaps it's an incoming call, and she dreads the news that the caller may bring.

I could go on - but I think you probably see where I'm going. This isn't a nice photo that you'd rather like on your wall, it's raw journalism that's telling a story in extreme depth & detail - and that's what's impressive about it.


For me.
 
Back
Top