james-bailey
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 49
- Name
- James
- Edit My Images
- No
Hey folks ive had my 40d for 6 months or so now and still leaning the basics from my mistakes but having fun all the same.
Ive bought 2 lenses along my way.
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Lens
I use the 17-85 mainly for taking scenery shots of lakes from the shore so the lowest part of the zoom comes in handy for wider shots to get more in. However whilst snapping away indoors it doesnt seem to work aswell with no flash.
Ive also bought the 50mm lens as advised by a friend and soon discovered the way how the f1.8 part of it creates a nice blury background when taking pictures of my springer spaniels close up.
Ive also noticed that this lens works much better indoors than the other without flash.
I gather that the f/4-5.6 is rather restrictive so been looking at what other lenses are on the market and the 17-55mm 2.8 takes my fancy (with a fancy price tag though...)
Am I right in thinking that this lens can pretty much replace both of the lenses I already have? I cant think of many situations where I have used to the zoom higher than 55mm anyway.
Any thoughts or other suggestions would be great,
Thanks
James
Ive bought 2 lenses along my way.
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Lens
I use the 17-85 mainly for taking scenery shots of lakes from the shore so the lowest part of the zoom comes in handy for wider shots to get more in. However whilst snapping away indoors it doesnt seem to work aswell with no flash.
Ive also bought the 50mm lens as advised by a friend and soon discovered the way how the f1.8 part of it creates a nice blury background when taking pictures of my springer spaniels close up.
Ive also noticed that this lens works much better indoors than the other without flash.
I gather that the f/4-5.6 is rather restrictive so been looking at what other lenses are on the market and the 17-55mm 2.8 takes my fancy (with a fancy price tag though...)
Am I right in thinking that this lens can pretty much replace both of the lenses I already have? I cant think of many situations where I have used to the zoom higher than 55mm anyway.
Any thoughts or other suggestions would be great,
Thanks
James