what is a good lens for pit lanes ??

Harrison~95

Suspended / Banned
Messages
49
Name
Alex
Edit My Images
No
thinking about getting a lens for pit lane stuff but not sure what to get ...?


what do you guys think :)
 
There is no answer to this question cause you could use anything from 8mm to 600mm really, what matters is what you want to achieve.
 
There is no answer to this question cause you could use anything from 8mm to 600mm really, what matters is what you want to achieve.

what you say is true..but im looking for sum think small and good quality
 
When I'm in the pits I use all of the following 10mm fisheye, 17-40, 24-70, 70-200 - take your pick.
Just depends on what I'm shooting and the effect I want.
 
Depends on your budget and what you want to acheive mate: but a few options are
Wide angle lens Tamron 10-24 i think it is ( around £350 last time i looked)
Midle range 17-55- canon 17-55 is around £500 acording to google
Or your 70-200 if you can get as far away as needed to fit the car in the frame
 
I think money plays a big part in your choices
 
Depends on your budget and what you want to acheive mate: but a few options are
Wide angle lens Tamron 10-24 i think it is ( around £350 last time i looked)
Midle range 17-55- canon 17-55 is around £500 acording to google
Or your 70-200 if you can get as far away as needed to fit the car in the frame

okay thanks for help but i just think my 70-200mm is to big for Lydden hill in the pits lol
 
I normally don't shoot from in the pit lane itself, however around the pits/paddock a 24-105, on a full frame camera, meets a lot of my needs and a 70-200 for those tighter shots and even a 100-400 for those tight portraits.

On a tight budget - if the light is ok even a kit lens (18-55) may be fine in pit lane itself.

Keep in mind that you may need a pass to even be in pit lane.
 
Last edited:
Are you wanting to shoot cars or bikes? People or machinery? Pit crew tyre change or refueling action or ???

I shoot a fair amount of pitlane stuff and regularly use pretty much every lens I own, which one at any particular occasion is just down to what I fancy.

Usually though, 70-200 if I'm after portraits of riders/drivers not on/in their machines and 18-50 if I want whole(ish) cars or some broader stuff or 10.5mm fisheye for some really bat***** crazy stuff!

More often than not however, its the 70-200 for the very simple reason that it probably is needed out on track and I try to reduce the amount of gear I carry around all day.

Don't forget to add a flash too - that makes a lot of difference to pitlane shots.
 
For portraits of drivers & paddock babes I'll go with my 70-200 but for the rest either my 17-40 or usually a 24-105.It all depends on what shot your after really.
 
Just to chuck some more info here for you, there are two things I consider with these:

1) Is my lens wide enough to fit in a car/bike when I am confined to the space of the safe part of the pitlane?

2) In the case of a really popular race series and high profile riders/drivers, is my lens short enough to allow me to get into a scrum to get the shot - no point in trying to use a 70-200 for that.

Probably #2 is only applicable for media accredited togs though, if you aren't media, not many pitlanes will let you in in the first place - but some do, always worth checking it out.
 
Back
Top