450d is an awesome camera, fantastic pictures, perfect for a beginner, but still will last you well into your pro-am days of togging
However I got a 40d. Because it's more robust, faster, and more ergonomical.
Whatever floats your boat![]()
Thanks foodpoison would you say it was on the same level as the Nikon d80

Tricky question, because the entire Canon range is below the entire Nikon range![]()
![]()

i was advised to buy the 40D if i could afford the price tag, there is a thread on here comparing the two and i read into the great links in one of the posts. Advice given was around the fact the 450 had a lot of good features but more menu driven whereas the 40D is a step close to more manual control.
I was in two minds as well, but when i felt the 40D in the shop knew it was the wiser choice, though not big handed, as foodpoison put it, it felt ergo' right for me.
I hangled for just the body though and bought a 24-105 from kerso (also recommended on these forums)...
the excellent "understanding exposure" by bryan peterson...cheap on amazon at moment.
Ekso