Website feedback please

Hi Harry, nice clean and simple with some good example shots. 2 constructive criticisms:
1. Hate the font you have used, makes it hard to read the details.
2. By just leaving a mobile number makes it seem transitory. I would either include address or landline.
hope you don't mind the comments, some lovely shots on there though. Living in Stamford gives you an unfair advantage. Make a few jaunts from Melton form time to time.
 
corny said:
Hi Harry, nice clean and simple with some good example shots. 2 constructive criticisms:
1. Hate the font you have used, makes it hard to read the details.
2. By just leaving a mobile number makes it seem transitory. I would either include address or landline.
hope you don't mind the comments, some lovely shots on there though. Living in Stamford gives you an unfair advantage. Make a few jaunts from Melton form time to time.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Oh poop only meant to use that font for menus... got damn useless preset editor!

I'm still living with my parents so I can't really go putting a landline number or address in.

Thanks for the comments :)
 
Its got a nice smooth transitional design, not sure how it works on phones etc. but it works well on the computer. You have a lot of spelling and grammar mistakes and quite a lot of the sample images are quite badly out of focus. I would be very careful about which ones you use to advertise your services especially the sports stuff. I didn't see any prices either.
 
Nice site, but that font on the header (name and menu) and footer is really hard to read, don't like that at all.

Like the theme/style, very slick and clean presentation of the photos.
 
connersz said:
Its got a nice smooth transitional design, not sure how it works on phones etc. but it works well on the computer. You have a lot of spelling and grammar mistakes and quite a lot of the sample images are quite badly out of focus. I would be very careful about which ones you use to advertise your services especially the sports stuff. I didn't see any prices either.
Click to expand...

Exactly the same on Chrome on my iPhone as my laptop, as for prices I can hardly do a flat rate for the sort of stuff I do..? All of the sports stuff on my website has been published. I know some of the shots aren't pin sharp (due to using my 120-300 wide open for DOF) but I think badly out of focus is a bit insulting.

Woblee said:
Nice site, but that font on the header (name and menu) and footer is really hard to read, don't like that at all.

Like the theme/style, very slick and clean presentation of the photos.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Is it just the size of the wording or the font itself?

Cheers, Harry.
 
Hazza said:
Exactly the same on Chrome on my iPhone as my laptop, as for prices I can hardly do a flat rate for the sort of stuff I do..? All of the sports stuff on my website has been published. I know some of the shots aren't pin sharp (due to using my 120-300 wide open for DOF) but I think badly out of focus is a bit insulting.
Click to expand...

It's not supposed to be insulting, but they're just out of focus, you wouldn't get away with taking a blurry portrait of someone and then blaming it on the aperture. This is a photography site after all.
 
The most memorable one was the cyclist on the track but also the red/white britcar pic and the black/white aston in the pits.
 
connersz said:
The most memorable one was the cyclist on the track but also the red/white britcar pic and the black/white aston in the pits.
Click to expand...

Panning at 1/15 off the top of my head, I liked the movement on the cyclist picture. I have one where the frame of the bike is pin sharp but the riders head is blurred as he looked up. Both pit shots have a small area of critical sharpness too, again because I'm panning at something like 1/20 at 10mm. Anyway I'm not going to argue with you as we're all entitled to opinions.
 
Hazza said:
Panning at 1/15 off the top of my head, I liked the movement on the cyclist picture. I have one where the frame of the bike is pin sharp but the riders head is blurred as he looked up. Both pit shots have a small area of critical sharpness too, again because I'm panning at something like 1/20 at 10mm. Anyway I'm not going to argue with you as we're all entitled to opinions.
Click to expand...

And some are better at accepting constructive feedback.
 
Hazza said:
Thanks. Is it just the size of the wording or the font itself?

Cheers, Harry.
Click to expand...

It's the font. I think it looks a bit squished, makes it hard to read. I think if the letters was slightly spaced apart it might make it more readable.
 
connersz said:
And some are better at accepting constructive feedback.
Click to expand...

I didn't ask for crit on my photos, I asked for crit on my website. I'd like to see you sport/motorsport shots if you're such an expert ;) And for the record your first post was hardly constructive with regards to my photos.

Woblee said:
It's the font. I think it looks a bit squished, makes it hard to read. I think if the letters was slightly spaced apart it might make it more readable.
Click to expand...

OK, I shall have a play with the character spacing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top