chrism_scotland
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 7,958
- Name
- Chris
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Something I've been meaning to post for a while... does anyone else thing that online retailers of used goods are a little "optimistic" in their condition ratings?
I'm really talking about WEX specifically, but I've noticed others do it too.
For example, looking at a Fuji 16-55 - WEX have a few and one is graded as "9-" = with their scale going from 1-10 (Low to High).
In the condition description however, they state this:
"This lens shows little use, the lens exhibits a few marks including light debris in the grips, light wear to the hood mount with marks of minor paint loss, small scratch to the front optic, dust in the optics."
Surely at the point their is any paint loss and a scratch to the front optic (minor or not) it shouldn't be rated as a "9-".... debris fair enough (usually cleans) and "wear to the mount" is just wear and tear but a scratch/paint missing certainly cosmetically wouldn't be a 9 in my book!!!
Imagine what a "2" looks like? Flattened by a truck?
I'm really talking about WEX specifically, but I've noticed others do it too.
For example, looking at a Fuji 16-55 - WEX have a few and one is graded as "9-" = with their scale going from 1-10 (Low to High).
In the condition description however, they state this:
"This lens shows little use, the lens exhibits a few marks including light debris in the grips, light wear to the hood mount with marks of minor paint loss, small scratch to the front optic, dust in the optics."
Surely at the point their is any paint loss and a scratch to the front optic (minor or not) it shouldn't be rated as a "9-".... debris fair enough (usually cleans) and "wear to the mount" is just wear and tear but a scratch/paint missing certainly cosmetically wouldn't be a 9 in my book!!!
Imagine what a "2" looks like? Flattened by a truck?
