TV ad

Jagang

Suspended / Banned
Messages
599
Name
Sophie
Edit My Images
Yes
Has anybody seen the tv ad for Barnados ( can't spell) with the young girl, is it just me or does anybody find it extremely disturbing. I have to turn the tv on mute or turn it over, it's horrible and really sad :(. Why put these adverts on TV???? :nono:
 
Is it the one where these "puppet" like characters breath out smoke to form one large word (can't remember what the word is). If it is, then that does unsettle me. If it's trying to "scare" us, it's doing a good job, but for the wrong reason.
What were the makers of that advert on when they came up with the concept? Looked like someone ate too many strong cheese sandwiches before going to sleep.
 
Is it the one where these "puppet" like characters breath out smoke to form one large word (can't remember what the word is). If it is, then that does unsettle me. If it's trying to "scare" us, it's doing a good job, but for the wrong reason.
What were the makers of that advert on when they came up with the concept? Looked like someone ate too many strong cheese sandwiches before going to sleep.

No not that one, it's where the girl is getting bullied, then slapped, then on drugs then in prison. Really unsettling and quite frightening really :(
 
If you found it disturbing then its done its job. I imagine this is the time of year when people are more likely to think family thoughts and donate to help the charities. Barnado also have radio adverts running at the moment so it looks like a pretty big campaign going out.
 
its the sound of her head being smacked that does it for me.. Its a hard hitting advert and a bloody good one at that. (no pun intended)
 
It's a hard hitting advert like gaz says, and it makes me feel really uncomfortable.
I've got a daughter, and it makes me think how easy it could be for her to end up down that road when she's older.

It just makes me feel really sorry for the girl. Spose that's the job really.

And it's just come on the TV as I typed this.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFOcrZeMRUU

Very moving. I think what makes it more disturbing is the use of a pretty girl that you would naturally assume would have no reason to end up in such scenarios.
It gets repeated quite a few times during the day.

A very disturbing and effective advert. As much as it disturbs, it's not as disturbing as the Iceland adverts with Katona, Nolan and Donovan. Now that is trully disturbing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYktaaEPXXo
 
Last edited:
its the sound of her head being smacked that does it for me.. Its a hard hitting advert and a bloody good one at that. (no pun intended)

Same here. I do find myself turning over when it comes on now. Tis very effective.

That Iceland one just makes me cry.

Best I saw recently was last night they showed a long one of those "this is what happens when you drink lots" type adverts, where everything is in reverse, some lass up the duff etc...anyway the advert doesn't really fade out, just stops and the very next advert, without missing a beat is one for Bacardi. Took me a while to realise it wasn't the same advert. The thought of "Drink Bacardi and get pregnant" seemed quite an interesting tag ling.
 
there were lots of complaints about the advert and they were all upheld

i stopped giving to Barnardos when they started using chuggers. I'm even less likely to give to them now because I resent these 'shock value' adverts.
And that 'kid' looks about 25 to me.
 
its the dog mule one that gets me talk to rank i think it is.
 
there were lots of complaints about the advert and they were all upheld

i stopped giving to Barnardos when they started using chuggers. I'm even less likely to give to them now because I resent these 'shock value' adverts.
And that 'kid' looks about 25 to me.

Does that mean it won't be shown again?

Saw it for the first time yesterday, but only on watching it on youtube just now did it get to me. Really not sure if I think it's a good thing to show it or not. :shrug:
 
Does that mean it won't be shown again?

Saw it for the first time yesterday, but only on watching it on youtube just now did it get to me. Really not sure if I think it's a good thing to show it or not. :shrug:

'upheld' might be the wrong word. i can never rememer which is which :)
but basically they said the advert is fine and the complaints were ignored.

i wouldnt mind so much if they just hit her once, but its over and over again. It looks like a chris morris parody of itself
 
'

[..]

i wouldnt mind so much if they just hit her once, but its over and over again.

[..]

I think that's the point really... for some children it's over and over again - until something is done about it.

For me, it's the most unsettling advertisement on TV, but shouldn't be stopped. It is doing it's job...

Anthony.
 
I think that's the point really... for some children it's over and over again - until something is done about it.

For me, it's the most unsettling advertisement on TV, but shouldn't be stopped. It is doing it's job...

Anthony.

but when i see it, i dont think 'i better give some money to Banardos because kids are being abused' i think 'for f***s sake another bunch of ******s working for an advertising agency trying to get an award with a shocking advert that must have taken about 5 mins to invent'
 
this advert...


[YOUTUBE]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MoHqFuDh-So&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MoHqFuDh-So&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YOUTUBE]
 
[youtube]<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AkcbAvtLFk4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AkcbAvtLFk4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>[/youtube]


the new one....
 
For anyone who has been subject to any or all of the events portrayed by the ads it's a bloody wonderful reminder of a past that has probably been blacked out.

Congratulations to Barnado's and their ad agency for revisiting suffering and pain on the victims. Wonderful REMOVED job.

That makes the context totally wrong so I'll rephrase it to: Wonderful destructive job.
 
Last edited:
I agree somewhat that the ad is doing it's job, but it's like the NSPCC ad, I think it is the slapping that does it for me and the bit about her being bullied. They can perhaps get the point across without it being so disturbing though, don't know how but i'm sure they could.

Thank you for your replies :)
 
but when i see it, i dont think 'i better give some money to Banardos because kids are being abused' i think 'for f***s sake another bunch of ******s working for an advertising agency trying to get an award with a shocking advert that must have taken about 5 mins to invent'

That is one of the reasons that I no longer work for the NSPCC. I left a good few years ago when the fundraising and advertising appeared to be overshadowing the good work that people were doing. There were occasions when I was encouraged not to share with people making donations what work I was actually doing. For example working with young abusers or perpetrators of domestic violence. This is because most of the people making donations want to believe that their money is going to poor little children who are being neglected and the marketing people did not want to upset them.

Those hard hitting adverts were a little wide of the mark as interestingly enough, all of the heavy end child protection stuff that is referred to the various agencies (NSPCC, Barnardoes, NCH, etc) is always passed on to the local Social Services Department to deal with as the voluntary agencies do not have statutory powers to deal with child protection and undertake enquires. People do not realise that. The NSPCC still has some statutory powers to investigate but have not used this for years.

When I worked for the NSPCC doing 'child protection work' I was viewed as almost a 'saint' by the public. (Good Marketing).

When I was doing child protection work for the Local Authority and Courts I was viewed as 'a do gooder', 'child snatcher', 'interfering b"%*!$d'. When I was actually doing good work and dealing with the referrals passed on to us by the NSPCC. (Bad / No Marketing).

It is all about perception and marketing. Guess who has a marketing budget?

Most of the agencies including the NSPCC do a great job of what they actually do. But it is not front line child protection work. The people that do that are the Local Authority Social Workers who get all the flack when something goes wrong.

The situations in the adverts being mentioned in this thread would all have been dealt with by the Local Authority Social Services Department. Once the children / young person was then safe, they may then be referred to the NSPCC, Barnardoes, etc for some work. The Local Authority would then be charged for this work by that agency. Most Local Authorities cannot afford to pay!!

If it is any consolation, Social Workers that I worked with at the NSPCC also cringed at those adverts as they knew that any child protection situations had to be passed to the Local Authority. Most of them were embarrassed to think that the public thought they were out there rescuing children.

Anyway, sermon over.

Happy Christmas to all.

Chris :)
 
Thanks for that Chris, that's quite an informative and eye opening read. Thanks for lettings us know from the 'other side' so to speak.

It's a similar thing with donations and donating. I rarely donate to big charities now, either money or clothes / goods etc.
Money as I think it's unfair that many charities are 'top heavy' and spend money unnecessarily. Goods in that they are only interested in the goods that they can sell on for profit. I'd rather my goods actually got used by the people who needed them.
 
It's a similar thing with donations and donating. I rarely donate to big charities now, either money or clothes / goods etc.
Money as I think it's unfair that many charities are 'top heavy' and spend money unnecessarily. Goods in that they are only interested in the goods that they can sell on for profit. I'd rather my goods actually got used by the people who needed them.

Have to say I share this view. I prefer to support the lifeboats (RNLI) out of all the charities. Child protection type charities have totally disengaged me over the years, especially the NSPCC.
 
We did support the NSPCC but they kept on ringing once a month asking me to up my payment, as did WWF, I have now cancelled the payments and put my money into more worth while stuff.
 
That is one of the reasons that I no longer work for the NSPCC. I left a good few years ago when the fundraising and advertising appeared to be overshadowing the good work that people were doing. There were occasions when I was encouraged not to share with people making donations what work I was actually doing. For example working with young abusers or perpetrators of domestic violence. This is because most of the people making donations want to believe that their money is going to poor little children who are being neglected and the marketing people did not want to upset them.

Those hard hitting adverts were a little wide of the mark as interestingly enough, all of the heavy end child protection stuff that is referred to the various agencies (NSPCC, Barnardoes, NCH, etc) is always passed on to the local Social Services Department to deal with as the voluntary agencies do not have statutory powers to deal with child protection and undertake enquires. People do not realise that. The NSPCC still has some statutory powers to investigate but have not used this for years.

When I worked for the NSPCC doing 'child protection work' I was viewed as almost a 'saint' by the public. (Good Marketing).

When I was doing child protection work for the Local Authority and Courts I was viewed as 'a do gooder', 'child snatcher', 'interfering b"%*!$d'. When I was actually doing good work and dealing with the referrals passed on to us by the NSPCC. (Bad / No Marketing).

It is all about perception and marketing. Guess who has a marketing budget?

Most of the agencies including the NSPCC do a great job of what they actually do. But it is not front line child protection work. The people that do that are the Local Authority Social Workers who get all the flack when something goes wrong.

The situations in the adverts being mentioned in this thread would all have been dealt with by the Local Authority Social Services Department. Once the children / young person was then safe, they may then be referred to the NSPCC, Barnardoes, etc for some work. The Local Authority would then be charged for this work by that agency. Most Local Authorities cannot afford to pay!!

If it is any consolation, Social Workers that I worked with at the NSPCC also cringed at those adverts as they knew that any child protection situations had to be passed to the Local Authority. Most of them were embarrassed to think that the public thought they were out there rescuing children.

Anyway, sermon over.

Happy Christmas to all.

Chris :)


yep thats true, and when i was in a local authority placement the social workers there used to moan about the NSPCC too.
 
Back
Top