Teaching photography

Andrew Dee

Suspended / Banned
Messages
13
Name
Andrew
Edit My Images
Yes
I am currently a trainee teacher of photography and would like to hear from anyone who has any ideas to help with equality and diversity in the classroom. One of my students has dyslexia and another is autistic.

Many thanks
Andrew
 
I think what you need is "differentiation", this is where you create content and set tasks to suit all levels of student ability.

If you are undergoing teacher training then surely your trainer should be able to advise on this?
 
Are you a PGCE, or SCITT trainee? As Chris says your training provider should beb offering advice on differentiation by task and by outcome. Also Dyslexia and Autism both exist on a continuum encompassing very broad ranges of need and capability. Getting some advice from your training provider about SEN support in general might also be helpful.
 
I am currently a trainee teacher of photography and would like to hear from anyone who has any ideas to help with equality and diversity in the classroom. One of my students has dyslexia and another is autistic.

Many thanks
Andrew

As Adrian said, are you on a PCE or PGCE course at present? You must be on something, as most institutions demand it... even if it's PTTLS. If so, they'll cover this issues in depth I would imagine. In practice though, you'll get a great deal of dyslexic students, as art & design seems to have more than it's fair share. Many things can help here. Diversify your teaching resources: Don't just print out stuff (and when you do, print enough out on light green paper as it helps dyslexic students), but also have the resources online if your school has a VLE like Moodle or Blackboard. Also, video resources are great for differentiation. Depending on what the lesson is, structure helps too. For instance, when I teach photoshop and Lightroom, I divide the session up into on screen walk throughs and demonstrations, set a task, and then go around the room giving one to one tuition. This allows the more advanced students to work at their own pace, and allows for me to spend more tie with those that need it.

Setting weekly tasks, and deliver the brief verbally, in print, and online.

Ask open questions, a great deal, and be mindful of drawing those who are quieter and less forthcoming into any discussions by asking them more questions. Don't let the know it all students dominate a session - be firm if necessary, but also reward the know it alls for their input... but instead of letting them answer everything, buddy them up with someone less able to work as a team. This helps the challenged student, and also empowers the know it all with some responsibility.

Don't make it obvious who your favourite students are. You will have them, and that's OK, but it can't be obvious to others, and you'll be surprised how intuitive some students are in this respect - they'll pick up on it if you're not careful.

It goes without saying also, that you leave any prejudices you have (and we all have them) at the door when you go to work.

Crit sessi9ons are crucial, and you need to quickly get them to open up and drive the session rather than them rely on you for all the input. This is a great opportunity to draw out the more shy students by careful and sympathetic feedback on what they say. Crits are hard for a new teacher, as they fear the "silence"... I've often sat for 5 minutes and said nothing once I've laid down the ground rules for crit. It's THEIR crit session, and they're not just there to hear what I have to say.

If you need any more specific advice, just ask: It's a big subject, and I've many years experience at teaching this subject at FE, BA and MA level.

You don't say what level you're teaching at though Andrew. It would be helpful to know this, as strategy changes as you go up through the levels.


[edit]

Also... don't think differentiation is just for those with learning difficulties. You have to have to be mindful that you are fully inclusive of everyone: Old, young, male, female, fast, slow, friendly, unpleasant. It's about giving everyone an equal opportunity to learn, and also using diverse methods so that everyone can learn in their own way.

Don't get scuked into the "VAK" debate... all this crap about Visual learners, Auditory learners, and Kinesthetic learners is all nonsense: There's a stack of research to suggest it's all b******s. Just give a range of resources - printed, online, and video is a great teaching tool that helps diversify.

Seminars are great too, as the student just feels like they are engaged in a conversation, but if they take notes, and listen well, seminars can be fantastic differentiation tools once everyone is comfortable speaking.

Oh... and even though I've just fallen into the trap myself above... despite what your superiors tell you, they are NOT l;earners... they are students. Learner is a patronising term for students, and they simply do not like it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Chris for your reply that was really helpful. Part of the PGCE course involves communicating with other like minded individuals so its great to get some feedback. I've been looking at differentiation but am trying to come up with some new strategies in the classroom and during practical sessions.
 
Hi Jao, yes PGCE. So are you in the uk? Both students in my class with autism and dyslexia have support with an LSP but I would like to try some new ideas to embed inclusion with these two students as well as involving the whole class too so that the two students who need extra support do not feel singled out.
 
Hi David, This is module 3 of my PGCE now so only 5 months left before I'm qualified!! Our tutor would like us to try and find some additional ways of embedding equality, diversity and differentiation for our students through communication with others, so here I am. We have covered the topic in great detail and have used different strategies in my classes but it would be great to hear any new suggestions. I have my third teaching observation on the first day back after the holidays so am trying to make sure it goes really well and I show them some new stuff.

My main group is FE level two so they are all around 17, although I also teach on a foundation degree course.

Thanks so much for giving me so much info on this subject, I think it will be so helpful. I've come from a commercial background working as a photographer for the past 30 years shooting editorial, PR and advertising with automotive and primarily interiors these days. Always wanted to lecture at some point so juggling my work with this course but all good so far. Its a completely different ball game to just shooting for a living!
 
David, I was just reading through what you had said about crits. I think they are so valuable too, not just for the students to get involved in communication and self evaluation but also for the teacher to assess the way the students feel about their own work and the work of others. I do have one guy in my FE class who is really keen and a bit of a know-it-all! I do have to try and get him to back off a little as he always wants to answer any questions put out to the group. But my worry is that I don't want him to start feeling that I am not interested in his input.

It is difficult to engage shy students anyway but I think they clam up more during cries as everyone else is listening to them. I try to add some humour to the session to engage them more but any other suggestions would be great.
 
Hi David, This is module 3 of my PGCE now so only 5 months left before I'm qualified!! Our tutor would like us to try and find some additional ways of embedding equality, diversity and differentiation for our students through communication with others, so here I am. We have covered the topic in great detail and have used different strategies in my classes but it would be great to hear any new suggestions. I have my third teaching observation on the first day back after the holidays so am trying to make sure it goes really well and I show them some new stuff.

My main group is FE level two so they are all around 17, although I also teach on a foundation degree course.

Thanks so much for giving me so much info on this subject, I think it will be so helpful. I've come from a commercial background working as a photographer for the past 30 years shooting editorial, PR and advertising with automotive and primarily interiors these days. Always wanted to lecture at some point so juggling my work with this course but all good so far. Its a completely different ball game to just shooting for a living!

Seminars are a great way to be inclusive, especially if you rotate around the group: Give out a 'reader' or two each week. A chapter of a book etc. Get one person each week to host the seminar - basically next week they introduce the subject, give their thoughts, and then invite questions and comments for further debate from the rest of the group. The good thing with this, is that it works at all levels as you only have to adjust the reading material to suit.

Getting the 'know it all' students teamed up with others (not exclusively... always get students to work in small groups in class sessions) but ensure that the know it alls are actually putting that knowledge to use by being a learning buddy to someone less able, or they'll get bored if they don't have a challenge.

Group presentations are another great way to get people involved - each group member has their own role to play in the presentation etc.

Technical demonstrations are another avenue for inclusivity, as you can include members of the group to help, assist etc.


Yes, humour is crucial. If you're a stern, old school headmaster type, you'll not be popular. The flip side of that coin is DO NOT try to win them over by being their 'mate'. It harms teaching ultimately. They may end up 'liking' you more than if you push and challenge them harder, but they aren't their to for entertainment, and it's not your job to entertain them.

Just blend as many learning resources as you can, and include as many group activities as you can. Don't worry about trying to innovate too much in your teaching - so long as you're trying new things regularly (whether they are innovative, or just new to you) is all that matters.

With regard to crit: Getting students to speak up in crits is a nightmare at this level (and even beyond actually). Many just want to come out with the usual "I like it" type crap. That's where "why?" comes in handy. First rule of Crit Club - You can not say "I like it" without giving a critical answer to WHY you like it. Assigning roles to certain people in crit is useful. Introduce the idea of 'Devil's Advocate' them, as it absolves them of guilt. The BIGGEST barrier to student performance ion crit (apart from not reading enough to be informed about what they think) is fear of upsetting someone if they have something negative to say. Making it plain that they are merely observing a ROLE in a crit kind of makes it easier. So assign a 'Critical friend' role to someone; a technical crit role to another etc etc. Rotate this throughout each semester, and give everyone a chance to try the roles out. Introduce each crit session with a recap of where everyone is based on last crit or tutorial session, then hand it over to them. Do NOT be scared of silence. As I said last time, building trust and ability to perform in crits is a fantastic way to embed differentiation as once trust is built in a group, more people will be more outspoken.
 
With Dyslexia at least, ask the Student how it affects them, and how they would like any resources printed. There is no one way that works for all. Hopefully at the age they are they should know what works for them as far as printed material goes.
 
Last edited:
Don't get scuked into the "VAK" debate... all this crap about Visual learners, Auditory learners, and Kinesthetic learners is all nonsense: There's a stack of research to suggest it's all b******s. Just give a range of resources - printed, online, and video is a great teaching tool that helps diversify..

And there is just as much if not more research to show it is true, you list a range of resources, if we all learnt the same you would not need different resources. This is exactly what Differentiation is on about, giving different learning resources to allow people to learn in their own way at their own pace.

Mike
 
In brief you are asking for some ways to be inclusive etc.
Your students should have a statement outlining what their specific difficulties are. After reading that (or just talking to them directly) you should be able to come up with some custom strategies yourself by the time you are on year two of teacher training.
Dyslexic students often respond well to pictorial handouts so how about some break out groups where small groups discuss three images and have to come up with three different types of comment (composition/exposure/technical or something?) then report findings- one each?

The work should include achievable outcomes for all while still stretching achievers and those less well equipped. Your observer will give you a big tick for stuff like that :)
 
And there is just as much if not more research to show it is true,

Outdated research, yes.

I'm not suggesting we all learn the same way, but that the prescriptive three tier system that says you either learn by seeing, listening, or doing is extremely limited, and hopelessly out of date. The fact is, we all benefit from a combination of these things, and people can't be neatly boxed into one of only three categories.
 
Thanks David, what you are saying all makes total sense. I think it is a fine balance between getting the students to like you and your teaching methods and not being seen as their 'mate'. I do find practical sessions far easier with continual assessment as well as being able to include all members of the classroom. Trying to ensure that all students are watching presentations and actively note taking has been a bit of a trial and I have tried to use a reward strategy with chocolate etc and this did seem to work well but I am aware that you can't just ply them with treats to get them to concentrate and get on with their work.
 
Thanks Redhead, I hadn't thought of speaking to the student directly but that does make sense.
 
Hi Mike, yeah i've been reading Geoff Petty and it has been really useful with differentiation, equality and diversity.
 
Hi Chris, Reading everyones posts I think that it is really important to actually chat with the students to see what their individual difficulties are and how they would like to see their resources etc, and what sort of things will help them with their learning. Cheers
 
David, I agree that having learners put into these three groups is very limiting as individuals could have so many different needs and each person really needs an ILP to support them with any difficulties.
 
Thanks David, what you are saying all makes total sense. I think it is a fine balance between getting the students to like you and your teaching methods and not being seen as their 'mate'. I do find practical sessions far easier with continual assessment as well as being able to include all members of the classroom. Trying to ensure that all students are watching presentations and actively note taking has been a bit of a trial and I have tried to use a reward strategy with chocolate etc and this did seem to work well but I am aware that you can't just ply them with treats to get them to concentrate and get on with their work.

Teaching theories seem to be like a**holes... everyone has one. There's so much difference between what many of the theorists you'll read about propose that you'll start to ask the obvious question most experienced teachers start to ask: They can't all be right, can they? Sure enough, they're not, no. There have been two theorists I maintain have robust ideas that are always relevant: Kolb and Vygotsky. Other stuff just seem to fall into, and out of fashion. Theories are either robust, or not.
 
Thats funnI had a teaching observation today, first day back!y but so true David, the module i've been working on (due in next week - GULP!!!!) is all about theorists. I think we need some new theorists to come out of the woodwork! I agree with the ones you have pointed out but am interested in Bruner too but then again he did follow on from Vygotsky didn't he???? Or is my brain frazzled!!

I had teaching observation today, my first day back and I think it went really well although you never quite know until you get your feedback. A really practical session on using photography in 3D applications - today was mask making with students shooting each others portraits them cutting and pasting them onto white masks - results were great and they loved the session which was great. Even less able able learners got stuck in which was good to see. Next part is for them to take pictures of each other around town wearing their masks but not sure how the less able learners will cope with this as they will be on their own. Its difficult too as I am only teaching there one day a week so its a while before I check in with them again. I applied a lot of your suggestions during the day and everything went so well so am really grateful for that.
 
Hi Andrew,

I thought I'd reply as I'm dyslexic. I've been taking photos regularly for my business for the last couple of years, unfortunately I find learning the theory behind things very difficult, it's kind of hard to explain, but the minute I start to read or be told about the technical aspects of photography I'm immediately very confused! However, this isn't to mean that my photos are terrible. I've been able to use my photos on a professional basis, although I'm sure most on here would say they're terrible as they don't meet certain 'rules' for photography, but as an art, really that doesn't matter. I also play the guitar, have done for many years, I apply the same logic to that, I can't read music, have absolutely no idea about music theory etc etc but that doesn't stop me from being a bloody good (if I do say so myself :lol:) guitarist.

I've joined up this forum as I'd like to do my best to learn more about the technical aspects of photography, it's kind of a last ditch attempt to learn. My business has evolved and now instead of purely having to take landscape photos I'm now having to take interior photos of my clients accommodation, and this is a whole new world to me and one that's completely out of my comfort zone, so I'd love to be able to have better knowledge of what the settings mean, what ISO and aperture and fstop etc means (I literally have no idea about any of them) so that I can get my images right through judgement rather than luck, or photoshop coming to rescue!

Anyhow, I just thought I'd explain my view on it from someone who's dyslexic's point of view, we sometimes find it very difficult to grasp things, not because we're 'thick' but because we're wired up slightly differently :D I would certainly suggest that explaining verbally, and perhaps finding ways of demonstrating physically the principles you're trying to explain, might really help your dyslexic student.

Best of luck with your course!
 
Anyhow, I just thought I'd explain my view on it from someone who's dyslexic's point of view, we sometimes find it very difficult to grasp things, not because we're 'thick' but because we're wired up slightly differently :D I would certainly suggest that explaining verbally, and perhaps finding ways of demonstrating physically the principles you're trying to explain, might really help your dyslexic student.

Is your type of Dyslexia helped by any colour of paper and ink combination? I know some people wear glasses with coloured lenses which help too, do you do that?

You may be interested in a live webcast next week called the Fundamentals of Photography 2015 on a site called Creativelive. It's a five day course starting on Monday the 12th, from about 5pm to midnight (ish) each day. I've watched different versions of it for the last couple of years and found them very good. The reason I think you may find it useful is that the person delivering the courses, John Greengo, likes to to demonstrate things with pictures and animations, which you may find easier to follow. Can't hurt to see if it helps, as it's free to watch. :)

For any Teachers watching, I've found a lot of good ideas for various aspects of Photography from the ways John Greengo uses slides and animations to describe various things. I think he said one year that he uses over 2000 slides over the five days. :eek:
 
Thats funnI had a teaching observation today, first day back!y but so true David, the module i've been working on (due in next week - GULP!!!!) is all about theorists. I think we need some new theorists to come out of the woodwork! I agree with the ones you have pointed out but am interested in Bruner too but then again he did follow on from Vygotsky didn't he???? Or is my brain frazzled!!

I had teaching observation today, my first day back and I think it went really well although you never quite know until you get your feedback. A really practical session on using photography in 3D applications - today was mask making with students shooting each others portraits them cutting and pasting them onto white masks - results were great and they loved the session which was great. Even less able able learners got stuck in which was good to see. Next part is for them to take pictures of each other around town wearing their masks but not sure how the less able learners will cope with this as they will be on their own. Its difficult too as I am only teaching there one day a week so its a while before I check in with them again. I applied a lot of your suggestions during the day and everything went so well so am really grateful for that.


Glad to hear everything went well. Being observed when you're new to all this is a bit nerve racking.
 
Hi Doctor, good to hear from you. Although I am doing my teacher training, I have been working as a commercial photographer for the past 30 years so coming into teaching quite late. In reality I want to get a couple of teaching days a week once I'm qualified in a few months to run alongside my commercial practice. I mainly shoot interiors myself but for interiors magazines.

There are some great books around to give info on the technical aspects of photography, one in particular by David Prykel. It's a really small pictorial dictionary that FE and degree students are advised to buy. This will explain everything really simply. Basically ISO is about sensitivity, for example 400 ISO will allow you to take pictures in lower light than 100 iso. The higher the ISO number, the more you can capture images in lower levels of light. But there is a down side, the higher the ISO number, the more gritty your images will look, so grainy looking. For commercial work and nice clear images you would try to stick to 100 ISO but not really go above 400 unless maybe shooting sport for newspapers etc. Aperture and f stop are the same thing. The aperture works like your eye. If it is dark your iris gets larger and in bright sunlight it gets smaller. Same thing with the the aperture, in lower light you need the lens to open more and less in bright light. Aperture is measured in f stops so f2.8 is wide open so lots of light entering the lens, so a bit like your eye in low light. F22 on the other hand has a small hole in the lens so not much light entering the lens, just like your eye in bright sunlight. The higher the aperture number the more of your photograph will be in focus from foreground to background. The lower the number, and you will only get a part of the scene in focus.

I do find that my students with dyslexia grasp the information much better when I am showing them something practically. In your case it may be worth enrolling in an evening course so you can be shown in a practical way. If you were local I'd show you myself.

Good luck!
 
hi David, it's funny because for some weird reason I don't get nervous with observations, it was just because it was on the first day back and difficult to organise stuff. It went really well and lots of challenging situations arose with chatting students during my presentation and another student playing loud music but I think I managed to control the situation quite well and explained why they shouldn't be doing those things. Assessment went really well and I was able to apply equality and diversity with less able students giving the students more support when they needed it and leased with the LSP so overall it went well. Hope my observer thought so too!
 
Thanks for the replies, both.

I'm working on the theory, will combine it with practice and see how I get on!
 
Back
Top