V vecsri Suspended / Banned Messages 669 Name Richard Black Edit My Images Yes 24 Nov 2007 #1 Any good? I have my new 24-70 so want the next one on, so then i can get rid of the 55-200 i have. I understand DG is for full frame and 35mm? So it's future proof if i ever win the lottery and can afford a D3
Any good? I have my new 24-70 so want the next one on, so then i can get rid of the 55-200 i have. I understand DG is for full frame and 35mm? So it's future proof if i ever win the lottery and can afford a D3
P PapaLazarou Suspended / Banned Messages 1,196 Name Mark Edit My Images Yes 24 Nov 2007 #2 Ye go for it it got a lot of great reviews, so you can go wrong.
-Oy- Suspended / Banned Messages 11,024 Name Dave Edit My Images No 24 Nov 2007 #3 vecsri said: I understand DG is for full frame and 35mm? Click to expand... DG is a lens coating. Sigma denote non-35mm compatible lenses as DC. So yes - ok on the D3!
vecsri said: I understand DG is for full frame and 35mm? Click to expand... DG is a lens coating. Sigma denote non-35mm compatible lenses as DC. So yes - ok on the D3!
dod TPer Emeritus Suspended / Banned Messages 16,680 Name Ebenezer McScrooge III Edit My Images Yes 24 Nov 2007 #4 vecsri said: Any good? Click to expand... Yep, IMO just as good if not better than Canon's F2.8 IS.
Eric Mc Suspended / Banned Messages 722 Name Eric...oddly enough Edit My Images Yes 24 Nov 2007 #5 Go for it mate it's a fantastic lens for the money Fits in very well with the 24-70mm you've already got.
Go for it mate it's a fantastic lens for the money Fits in very well with the 24-70mm you've already got.
P PapaLazarou Suspended / Banned Messages 1,196 Name Mark Edit My Images Yes 24 Nov 2007 #6 dod said: Yep, IMO just as good if not better than Canon's F2.8 IS. Click to expand... NO NO NO, how wrong you are, it's a great lens but not as good as the Canon 70-200 L IS USM.
dod said: Yep, IMO just as good if not better than Canon's F2.8 IS. Click to expand... NO NO NO, how wrong you are, it's a great lens but not as good as the Canon 70-200 L IS USM.
dod TPer Emeritus Suspended / Banned Messages 16,680 Name Ebenezer McScrooge III Edit My Images Yes 24 Nov 2007 #7 PapaLazarou said: NO NO NO, how wrong you are, it's a great lens but not as good as the Canon 70-200 L IS USM. Click to expand... This will really wind you up Papa http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=39756
PapaLazarou said: NO NO NO, how wrong you are, it's a great lens but not as good as the Canon 70-200 L IS USM. Click to expand... This will really wind you up Papa http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=39756
OP V vecsri Suspended / Banned Messages 669 Name Richard Black Edit My Images Yes 24 Nov 2007 #8 Thats that sorted then