I'm not really understanding as image size really depends on the PPI it's output at.
The LR print module can measure in inch/cm and display the corresponding PPI as it is resized.
I'm looking for something that is easier than physically putting a ruler against the monitor, as I said the pixels just seemed a useful addition. Among, other things, I want to be able to adjust images on screen so they are an exact size e.g 5" long.If measuring in screen pixels is enough, you can just use the screen grab tool (shift+cmd+4)... press escape to not take the grab. It wouldn't be hard to apply a conversion factor to get inch/cm/etc if you really needed...
Interesting problem. Like Steven, I’m having difficulty understanding what you want to do, or rather the “why” would be more helpful. I have had to do this recently where I converted a photo to a graphic and needed to print the result so that an added circle was 1 inch in diameter so I inserted the image into Apple Pages where I could resize it to exact measurements. Not sure that will help you though, it all depends on the “why”.
There’s the ‘Measure’ app in iOS 12 where you use the iPhone/iPad as a virtual ruler measuring things remotely (so it’s the equivalent of holding the ruler to the creek but at a distance) though I’m not sure that would work for you.
If you use the screen grab function it tells you the size of area (length/width) selected in display pixels. On my MBPr set to the default display resolution (1440x) that equates very closely to 4px/mm or 100px/in (4.01/101 exactly).I'm looking for something that is easier than physically putting a ruler against the monitor, as I said the pixels just seemed a useful addition. Among, other things, I want to be able to adjust images on screen so they are an exact size e.g 5" long.
Thanks, for the effort, but this seems like more work, rather than less work, than just using a physical ruler, to adjust an image so it's exactly 5" long on screen.If you use the screen grab function it tells you the size of area (length/width) selected in display pixels. On my MBPr set to the default display resolution (1440x) that equates very closely to 4px/mm or 100px/in (4.01/101 exactly).
Which means the reply button below is pretty much exactly 1inch on my display because it measures 101px wide.
You don’t take a photo with Measure but it uses the camera and you tap the end points you wish to measure and it ‘knows’ the distance from camera to them and can triangulate. I’ve only played with it and it’s pribably more for room measurements etc.Thanks, I don't think my old IOS devices will run this, but it also seems to need you take a photograph with an IOS device rather than it measuring existing images on my Mac.
But I'm not short of apps to try, (e.g. https://www.ondesoft.com/rulers/) just trying to benefit from the experience of others, but so far it's obvious no one has used any, or even know what I'm talking about![]()
Uhm... since 101px = 1" on my screen I would just make the image 505px long with any image resizing tool...Thanks, for the effort, but this seems like more work, rather than less work, than just using a physical ruler, to adjust an image so it's exactly 5" long on screen.
It looks as if I can't avoid downloading and comparing a selection of on screen ruler programs :-(
I think Steven is right about the screen grab as I use that all the time (maps in browser windows) though I usually the use Preview and annotate and save them.
Uhm... since 101px = 1" on my screen I would just make the image 505px long with any image resizing tool...
https://plumamazing.com/product/pixelstick/ and better than the program that I suggested in an earlier post.
Yes, I’ve just been reading it web site and can’t see how it does what you want — without buying and trying it, which I’m not going to do![]()
This http://www.pascal.com/software/freeruler/ gives a floating ruler but I haven't worked out how to calibrate it to actual measurements![]()
Thanks, I found this but was put off a bit by the price, which was a bit more than I wanted to spend. Interesting it still only gives pixels and point. I was rather hoping for something that would self calibrate to the screen resolution and give cm and inches , but everything I've found so far needs calibrationI’ve used Xscope, I’d need to check if it does inches, but it would have to know what dpi the monitor was. It is spendy; I’ve had it since the early days and used it for web and screen design.
EDIT: it measures in Pixels and Points.
Thanks, I found this but was put off a bit by the price, which was a bit more than I wanted to spend. Interesting it still only gives pixels and point. I was rather hoping for something that would self calibrate to the screen resolution and give cm and inches , but everything I've found so far needs calibration
It’s an interesting problem but like David I feel you may need to think outside the box since we can’t see what your object is in doing this .Thanks for the effort your putting into this, but I've already found these, and many others. The point of my post was that given I was finding so many options, many when you follow them up turn out to be dead links or last updated many years ago, that I was hoping to find someone who was actively using something they knew still worked.

Thanks, I found this but was put off a bit by the price, which was a bit more than I wanted to spend. Interesting it still only gives pixels and point. I was rather hoping for something that would self calibrate to the screen resolution and give cm and inches , but everything I've found so far needs calibration
I just want to measure things on screen, which I currently use a physical ruler for, and as I was aware of on-screen rulers, it was suggestions for an on screen ruler I was asking about.It’s an interesting problem but like David I feel you may need to think outside the box since we can’t see what your object is in doing this .![]()
I just want to measure things on screen, which I currently use a physical ruler for, and as I was aware of on-screen rulers, it was suggestions for an on screen ruler I was asking about.
I thought it was a simple question, not a particularly interesting one, not one that required any out the box thinking, not one that required any detailed explanation, nor one that need me to explain the multiple things I measure on the screen, because, as I saw it, I just wanted a simple on-screen ruler. However, having looked at the extra features that programs like pixelshift offer, and that everything I've found seems to need calibration, I may well go for something more sophisticated than a simple ruler.
The on screen rulers you linked to were exactly the type of program I was looking for. But the point of posting wasn't to get someone to repeat the search I had already done and re-find the programs I had already found, but to try and benefit from peoples' experiences, because as I said, there are dozens of these types of programs available, and my hope was for help in identifying one that people were already happily using.
So, I was hoping for something like " I used to use x, which was free, but I now use y, which although not free, was worth the money because it crashes less often and it allows me to measure angles, which may or may not be useful to me" Or "I used to use program x, but since upgrading to High Sierra, it's stopped working and hasn't been updated for 5 years, I'm now using X".
I still appreciate, the effort you and David have gone to, but I really did think it was a simple question, that would have been easy to answer, or just ignored.
Perhaps if you told us what problem your really trying to solve, we could help.
I cannot for the life of me fathom out what is trying to be achieved here.
.

to see it While I appreciate the responses, this has become horribly complicated.
I make measurements on screen for multiple purposes (including biological, and cartographic as well as occasionally photographic), with images displayed in a range of different programs currently the measurements are often made with a physical ruler held against the screen.
There are dozens of on screen rulers and measurement tools available, many recommended for graphic design purposes (hence my assumption there might be some users on this forum) as well as scientific uses, and I just want to replace my physical ruler with an on-screen one.
Many of the available programs seem to be old (but may still work fine), and as its such a simple tool, and they all look similar so it may not matter which one I use, but again there may well be one particular program which is recognised as "the best" or it may be that all the low cost or free programs have issues and people have learnt its worth while paying for something better
I did think this was a very simple question and that only people who used on-screen rulers would respond to it. I didn't think it needed any explanation of all the uses I put a ruler to, as it seemed straightforward that I just wanted some help in choosing between the many on screen ruler programs that are available.
I appreciate, maybe because people are unfamiliar with on-screen rulers, that there has been an effort to identify a specific problem, to try and find a solution, but I really do just want an on-screen ruler program.
Coming from an IT background, I’m struggling to think of a display I’d trust to measure with a ruler, it might work for comparison purposes, but if I wanted to know the size of a screen object, I’d be expecting to pay for software that was absolutely certain it knew the specifications of my screen.
People understand the question, they don't understand why measuring something on a screen with a ruler can be of any use for anything, and were hoping for an explanation (beyond "I want to measure something on my screen with a ruler").
You could do that with most image editing programs. Certainly photoshop would make it simple.Does it really matter, in terms of my question on choosing an onscreen ruler.
But as an example, although most of the time I'm working in programs with proper measurement tools, sometimes for speed, If I have a photograph of ten beetles and 20 seeds etc that includes a 100mm scale. I adjust the photograph size until the 100mm scale in the photograph is 100mm on the screen and then take direct measurements of the beetles or seeds with a ruler.
Or sometimes I want to resize multiple images on the desktop which have all been taken at different scales and I want them all to be at the same scale, or occasionally all at the same size (regardless of file resolution)
I just have occasions where an on screen ruler would be a useful thing to have available.
Coming from an IT background, I’m struggling to think of a display I’d trust to measure with a ruler, it might work for comparison purposes, but if I wanted to know the size of a screen object, I’d be expecting to pay for software that was absolutely certain it knew the specifications of my screen.
Does it really matter, in terms of my question on choosing an onscreen ruler.
But as an example, although most of the time I'm working in programs with proper measurement tools, sometimes for speed, If I have a photograph of ten beetles and 20 seeds etc that includes a 100mm scale. I adjust the photograph size until the 100mm scale in the photograph is 100mm on the screen and then take direct measurements of the beetles or seeds with a ruler.
Or sometimes I want to resize multiple images on the desktop which have all been taken at different scales and I want them all to be at the same scale, or occasionally all at the same size (regardless of file resolution)
I just have occasions where an on screen ruler would be a useful thing to have available.
You could do that with most image editing programs. Certainly photoshop would make it simple.
You could do that with most image editing programs. Certainly photoshop would make it simple.
It's only because we are interested
Which is why we are all a bit nonplussed.