It also leaves the tripod shoe free.
Thank chaps
I'm going to put in an offer on the one on ebay and see what happens if I like the action but want better quality I'll get a proper one
MB
I always fancied an R-strap but felt reluctant to fork out 50 odd quid for one - its way too expensive. So I just bought an Op tech sling adaptor from here which works really well and does the same kind of job as the R-strap at a fraction of the price. It also leaves the tripod shoe free. Of course, it helps if you have an Op tech strap in the first place.![]()
What about this from optech? Optech Dual Harness for £33
http://www.optech-online.co.uk/optech-dual-camera-binocular-harness.htm
What about this from optech? Optech Dual Harness for £33
http://www.optech-online.co.uk/optech-dual-camera-binocular-harness.htm
Don't forget these are actually Wokingham Photographic not Optech and this should be read first
I've got one of these, if you want one start your offer around £18 and work your way up as they seem to pick at random what offer to except as I paid £22. I use it with a gripped D300, Sigma 100-300 or Fuji S5 Pro, Nikon 17-55 2.8 and it works really well and is very comfortable.
I tried one of the Chinese ones to see if I liked the idea before spending money on a decent system and I've abandoned it after one wedding. It was comfortable and I thought it showed a lot of promise but there were a couple of reasons I decided against it.
I found it too bulky to have a camera on either side of me and moving about in confined spaces was a nightmare. The cameras kept banging against my hips to the point I was getting bruises! (I do move quite quicky at times and found the cameras just swinging about too much)
But the biggest problem was one that the Gentlemen would not have to worry about so much but the Laydees might have a similar problem to me. No, not the chest strap but going for a wee!
I was shooting in an hotel and between the ceremony and groups nipped into the ladies. Well, I could not get into the cubicle easily without hammering several thousand pounds worth off the walls and when I did get in I could not use the facility with the cameras in position. I had to take the whole lot off and leave it unguarded just so I could have a wee!
I came home and bought a bag that takes all my gear and that can come everywhere with me, including the ladies!![]()
it is certainly an art, though one I have now mastered, first few times were a bit tricky though! Very small cubicles are a problem, but generally I can do it quite easily now. I also use a waist bag [yes yes, like a bum bag for those old enough to remember, but a square shaped one] for carrying cards, batteries, cash, and other bits and pieces and that can be twisted round to be where its more convenient for whatever I am doing - front, back or side.
] but the inside of my legs from the hood of the long lens - because it points backwards when not in use, too much swinging and it would actually cause the pointy bits of the hood to catch the inside of opposite leg. Shortening the straps has stopped this and I now find it a very comfortable system. Also good that you can pop an open jacket or similar over the top if the weather gets a bit chilly or damp. I bought one of these and after a few hours of use the plate's orifice (the plate that attaches to the lens/camera) started widening. The metal seems to be very soft and within just a couple of uses I started noticing the black paint worn out and upon further inspection noticed that the hole was widening due to the stress of the hook. So much so that it became so wide that I was afraid that it would give way dropping my kit while hanging. I know of one other person (Mike-P) who bought it at the same time as me and started having the very same problem.
I understand that some of the users have never used that plate and decided to use the Manfrotto Q plate instead and hook into it. But I have couple of problems with it. First the manfrotto Q-plate has a metal ring on it which could be used to hook the R-Strap into it, and I am not sure if that would be strong enough to sustain weight from a heavy lens/camera and support the balancing of it while walking etc. That metal ring although very strong aparently but it was never designed to sustain such a weight but to be used to give a gripping platform to the fingers in order to screw tightly or unscrew the Q-Plate onto the lens mounting ring.
Secondly and most importantly my confidence is shaken on the R-strap itself, if the plate is so cheaply made that it erodes just after a few hours of usage how can I be sure of the rest of the materials used for other components including the hook itself of not having been made of cheap materials also?
I know this is probably just in my mind, but still it raised big issues for my confidence hanging a couple of grand worth of equipment on that strap and walking for hours while it takes the load.
I stopped using it since I noticed it.
Truth be said though, it really felt comfortable using it. What a difference it makes carrying the kit in that position around the neck/shoulder. So I definitely am in the market for something similar to that. Just can't see myself spending a lot of money for it. Surely there must be a good option at reasonable cost
I think you are referring to the Quick Strap RS4 linked to above, and not the Black Rapid R-Strap?
I understand that some of the users have never used that plate and decided to use the Manfrotto Q plate instead and hook into it. But I have couple of problems with it. First the manfrotto Q-plate has a metal ring on it which could be used to hook the R-Strap into it, and I am not sure if that would be strong enough to sustain weight from a heavy lens/camera and support the balancing of it while walking etc.
But the biggest problem was one that the Gentlemen would not have to worry about so much but the Laydees might have a similar problem to me. No, not the chest strap but going for a wee!
I was shooting in an hotel and between the ceremony and groups nipped into the ladies. Well, I could not get into the cubicle easily without hammering several thousand pounds worth off the walls and when I did get in I could not use the facility with the cameras in position.
I'm glad to see that there's some objective discussion about these straps this time.
http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=225482
They're just not for everyone and I still say that for someone on a walk who lifts their camera now and then, they're probably fine but for someone shooting cars that are tearing past every 20 or 30 seconds, they're not the way to go.
I can't wait to take mine motor racing, I lift 2 different bodies/lens combos hundreds of times at a wedding each weekend and having shot plenty of motor racing in the past, looking forward to finally having an efficient way of doing it AND a much easier way of lugging stuff round the circuit. You are however very correct, they are not for everyone, and its up to each individual person to find what suits them I can't wait to take mine motor racing, I lift 2 different bodies/lens combos hundreds of times at a wedding each weekend and having shot plenty of motor racing in the past, looking forward to finally having an efficient way of doing it AND a much easier way of lugging stuff round the circuit. You are however very correct, they are not for everyone, and its up to each individual person to find what suits them
![]()
I'm glad to see that there's some objective discussion about these straps this time.
http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=225482
They're just not for everyone and I still say that for someone on a walk who lifts their camera now and then, they're probably fine but for someone shooting cars that are tearing past every 20 or 30 seconds, they're not the way to go.
I'm also interested that the build quality of the various straps mentioned is being talked about as we all carry some precious, expensive kit and to have it hanging on a wing and a prayer from some webbing stitched together in a sweatshop over in the far East seems slightly mad.