Processing fog and mist

RumpFace

Suspended / Banned
Messages
502
Edit My Images
No
Back in January, i shot a scene at Derwent reservoir in fog/mist, it was minus 4, just about daybreak. I shot it RAW and jpeg on my 6D, now i'm quite happy that i got a nice shot, but i;m torn with the processing, do i embrace the ethereal look or try to make more sense of it by increasing the clarity, contrast etc.
link to the in camera jpeg that i uploaded to 500px https://500px.com/photo/215535385/winter-fog-by-rob-thrall
 
Probbably better to post photo on here. Rather than posting a link. Without seeing it my first thought is. If it was the ethereal misty look that made the scene attractive to you. Why process it out.
 
Brightening the shadows by 35-50 %, certainly makes an improvement including the colour in my opinion
 
Probbably better to post photo on here. Rather than posting a link. Without seeing it my first thought is. If it was the ethereal misty look that made the scene attractive to you. Why process it out.
The upload was too large and i didn't fancy resizing it.
 
It's one of the rare times where i can't make up my mind how i want it to look. I think the one in the lnk is too blue but it was at dawn blue hour, but if i make it too neutral it loses atmosphere.
 
It's one of the rare times where i can't make up my mind how i want it to look. I think the one in the lnk is too blue but it was at dawn blue hour, but if i make it too neutral it loses atmosphere.

I think I'd go for...

Untitled-1-f.jpg

Or maybe that's still a little blue.
 
I prefer the original, blue and all
 
I think I'd go for...

View attachment 103890

Or maybe that's still a little blue.

Yeah i got the same sort of look myself, but i also got seduced by the pesky clarity slider, i don't remember in my mind's eye that i could "see" each tree on the far bank but the slider revealed them, not sure i liked it though.
 
Back
Top