RichieRich
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 223
- Edit My Images
- No
Hi there,
Up until now I've generally used the Canon Raw software which came with my 50D for processing images. My workflow was very simple. I upped the shaprness to between 5 and 7 (out of 10) then saved as a resized JPEG in order to place the images on my site.
I then used photoshop to apply a watermark to the images and make any colour adjustments to the photo.
I've since started to use the camera raw plugin for photoshop as this has some nice recovery features etc which Canon's software doesn't have. However, when I open the image in photoshop and resize it I get results when simply don't compare well to what the Canon software can produce - and that's without pixel picking. To be honest I'd go as far as saying that photoshop produces blurred images.
No amount of messing about with the unsharpen mask in photoshop seems to help.
Is there something which I'm missing or should I simply stick to the Canon software.
Thanks,
Rich
Up until now I've generally used the Canon Raw software which came with my 50D for processing images. My workflow was very simple. I upped the shaprness to between 5 and 7 (out of 10) then saved as a resized JPEG in order to place the images on my site.
I then used photoshop to apply a watermark to the images and make any colour adjustments to the photo.
I've since started to use the camera raw plugin for photoshop as this has some nice recovery features etc which Canon's software doesn't have. However, when I open the image in photoshop and resize it I get results when simply don't compare well to what the Canon software can produce - and that's without pixel picking. To be honest I'd go as far as saying that photoshop produces blurred images.
No amount of messing about with the unsharpen mask in photoshop seems to help.
Is there something which I'm missing or should I simply stick to the Canon software.
Thanks,
Rich