zedbra
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 219
- Name
- Geoff
- Edit My Images
- No
I've always used my own directory structure when storing files for photography, music, or anything else. It makes sense that way and I see little reason to complicate matters by using software's own way to organise files. Before the organiser part of Photoshop Elements 4 stopped working when I updated my PC, I used the organiser for viewing and choosing photos to edit, but I still used my own directory structure for storing the files rather than using the Organiser's method. Using my own method, I can also find my photos in the same way when I want to use them for something else (attaching to emails, uploading to online printers, etc).
I'm getting Elements 7 in a couple of weeks (waiting for my Birthday!) and am wondering if I should use the Organiser 'properly' this time. Do people find it better than using their own directory structure? Are their benefits to it? My main concern in the past has been that if one file gets corrupted, would I not then lose the whole thing and then have all my photos bunched together in the same place? I can imagine spending weeks sorting through them again! I keep backups but even so, I can imagine the problems it may cause.
Any comments/help on what's best will be much appreciated.
I'm getting Elements 7 in a couple of weeks (waiting for my Birthday!) and am wondering if I should use the Organiser 'properly' this time. Do people find it better than using their own directory structure? Are their benefits to it? My main concern in the past has been that if one file gets corrupted, would I not then lose the whole thing and then have all my photos bunched together in the same place? I can imagine spending weeks sorting through them again! I keep backups but even so, I can imagine the problems it may cause.
Any comments/help on what's best will be much appreciated.