Photoshop CC is now out.

$19.99 us photoshop or $49.99 for the suite US (per month first year). Uk prices £17.58 or £46.88 (per month first year)
 
swanseamale47 said:
$19.99 us photoshop or $49.99 for the suite US (per month first year). Uk prices £17.58 or £46.88 (per month first year)
Click to expand...

I might try and register on the US site then give that the current exchange rate would make that price a little under £32 a fair saving over the years :shake:
 
I've signed up for a year at £15.88 for the full suite (Academic rate FTW).

Not sure I'll continue after the year but we'll see!
 
WillNicholls said:
It's country specific I believe.
Click to expand...

Probably so but it's a bit crappy that were going to get stung for about £180 a year more for the exact same software :(
 
I will seriously consider it as I've just switched over to a mac and my very old copy of PS could do with an upgrade anyway. Just ordered the upgrade to LR5 and just can't stomach £600 right now for a full copy of CS6. Crazy money considering I use PS infrequently these days, if only elements incorporated curves it would suffice for most keen amateurs like myself.
 
Livin The Dream said:
if only elements incorporated curves it would suffice for most keen amateurs like myself.
Click to expand...
I may be missing the bleeding obvious, or simply being mind-blowingly stupid, but…

…if the main reason you'd use PS is for curves, LR4+ has curves in it already.

<Patiently waits for my extreme ignorance to be pointed out to me!> :lol:

LR fills 95% of my needs and consequently I refuse to update PS until I'm forced into a corner.

Cheers,
Tony
 
You're kinda correct Tony but you're limited to overall adjustments, you just can't make selections in the same way as you can in PS which is the whole reason for 99% of my use, selective adjustments. Also sharpening is far superior.
 
I haven't used it much, but the image stabilisation is an interesting feature that works to an extent - I didn't really pay attention to the sliders that much (just whacked the top one to the right a bit), I guess with more care I could have reduced the haloing effect, and images with less random blur (like a simple up/down blur, mirror slap) could well be fixed (I'm thinking landscape work/long exposures of still objects). This was at 28mm equiv. and at 1/8th sec:

SEuQL2K.jpg


Look at how it managed to render the text on the light meter and how clear the Rolleflex logo/focusing knob on the right is.
 
FruitFlakes said:
SEuQL2K.jpg


Look at how it managed to render the text on the light meter and how clear the Rolleflex logo/focusing knob on the right is.
Click to expand...

I am pretty impressed with that. For a man who shakes more than a 1957 Morris Minor it might be worth the £15 a month to me just for that alone :)

Steve
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top