mulch
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,024
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Im sure this has been asked a number of times before, so here goes and please be gentle if it has:
Following the demise of my Nikon 18-70 lens which I thought was quiet a sharp lens, Im now considering buying one of the following to take its place - the Sigma 18-50 2.8 macro or Tamron 17-50 2.8.
I do have the Nikon 18-200 which I believe to be a very good all in one walkabout lens, but as many other people have stated, its not the sharpest of lens which I do agree with, so I would like to think the one I eventually choose will be a (even if small) step up in sharpness from the 18-200.
So, Im deciding between these two lenses and would like to hear of any opinions/experiences people may have of either of these. Price wise they are very similar, so the deal breaker I suspect will be quality etc. I had a rummage in the Search this Forum for info, but with little feedback from any owners of either of these lens.
Any help will be gratefully received.
mulch
Following the demise of my Nikon 18-70 lens which I thought was quiet a sharp lens, Im now considering buying one of the following to take its place - the Sigma 18-50 2.8 macro or Tamron 17-50 2.8.
I do have the Nikon 18-200 which I believe to be a very good all in one walkabout lens, but as many other people have stated, its not the sharpest of lens which I do agree with, so I would like to think the one I eventually choose will be a (even if small) step up in sharpness from the 18-200.
So, Im deciding between these two lenses and would like to hear of any opinions/experiences people may have of either of these. Price wise they are very similar, so the deal breaker I suspect will be quality etc. I had a rummage in the Search this Forum for info, but with little feedback from any owners of either of these lens.
Any help will be gratefully received.
mulch