Hi all,
Im thinking of doing some Macro photography and I'm trying to decide between these 2 lens:
AF-S Micro NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8G ED Lens, Closest Focus 0.6ft
AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED, Closest Focus 1ft
There seems to be about £150 differnce in the price between them. Since they are both 2.8, I was wondering that since the 60mm can get in closer because of the minimum distance, would I get about the same magnification on them? In which case I should probably go for the cheaper one, unless anyone had a reason that I should get the 105mm??
I shall be using this on either the D600 or D800, which I intend to buy within the next 2 weeks
Im thinking of doing some Macro photography and I'm trying to decide between these 2 lens:
AF-S Micro NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8G ED Lens, Closest Focus 0.6ft
AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED, Closest Focus 1ft
There seems to be about £150 differnce in the price between them. Since they are both 2.8, I was wondering that since the 60mm can get in closer because of the minimum distance, would I get about the same magnification on them? In which case I should probably go for the cheaper one, unless anyone had a reason that I should get the 105mm??
I shall be using this on either the D600 or D800, which I intend to buy within the next 2 weeks