Isn't it the SB-26 from that era which has the optical slave built in?
EmZee, Yep, SB24/25/26 all came with optical slaves built-in. Think the difference were slight design changes (buttons etc) and power outage. They're pretty much all alike though and very reliable, even after a decade or so of evolution.
Jolster, I have two 'wireless' set-ups; one uses the ebay PT-04 triggers and the other uses several Nikon SU-4 TTL adaptors. The former I use when I'm working tight to a subject where long signal range isn't a priority. The
SU-4 units are used when I want TTL control, although you can use them in manual mode. They've got good range and work optically (like the built-in slaves on the SB24). I actually don't use them that often because most of my magazine work calls for portable flash that's totally off-camera - the SU-4 units I generally fire via a flash (usually my SB800) attached to the camera.
Using the ebay triggers is well simple. I shoot in manual most of the time, as I'm generally exposing about a third under and unless the light is changing a lot, then this is the simplest way for me. Then I just connect the transmitter to the hotshoe and the flash to the trigger (I usually handhold one unit; the tripods only come out when using two or more flashes) and shoot. I set the flash to manual and just change the power output to suit. I'm shooting important stuff for magazines but rarely I don't have the option to get the subject to hold the pose so i can shoot off several 'versions' at different power levels. I suppose if you want full remote TTL flash then Skyports are the kiddy, but they're £200+.
Here's a sample pic:
The first is a DPS shot for a carp fishing magazine. Obviously, the light is from the left and from behind Jon (my trusty subject) so casts his face into shadow, althought he controllers in his hand have a nice look as they're see-through and are well lit.
To get round this I just set the exposure, fixed up the SB800 on a trigger witht he diffuser over the front to soften the light. I can't remember the settings but I doubt at this close range it was more than 1/4 power, more likely 1/8th.
You can see that the light hasn't affected the exposure on his hand (aside from a bit of light coming in from the right) but its put enough light into his face to make him recognisable but more important, eye-catching. I've obviously changed the composition between shots but not by much - you get my drift
I'll dig out some more examples in a short while...
