I'm debating whether it's worth trading in my Nikon - AF-S ED VR 70-300mm Len for a second hand Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D ED.
For me, the biggest pro would be the f2.8, which would be ideal for gig/concert photography, where-as currently I wouldn't even consider using the 70-300mm because of any potential difficulties in low light. The obvious downside to the 80-200mm is the lack of VR (certainly can't afford the f/2.8G AF-S VR IF-ED lens) and also the fact that I'll be relying on the motor in the camera body (D7000).
Having looked at some of the posts on here (and reviews elsewhere), the 80-200mm does seem to be highly regarded by many people, but would I be wasting my money doing this trade in?
Thanks.
Steve
For me, the biggest pro would be the f2.8, which would be ideal for gig/concert photography, where-as currently I wouldn't even consider using the 70-300mm because of any potential difficulties in low light. The obvious downside to the 80-200mm is the lack of VR (certainly can't afford the f/2.8G AF-S VR IF-ED lens) and also the fact that I'll be relying on the motor in the camera body (D7000).
Having looked at some of the posts on here (and reviews elsewhere), the 80-200mm does seem to be highly regarded by many people, but would I be wasting my money doing this trade in?
Thanks.
Steve