mikew
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 5,548
- Name
- mike
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Watching the 135mm 1.8 with interest![]()

If the 24-70 is anything like their other "Art" glass it should be good, although I fear it might suffer the same fate as the 24-105, excellent IQ but built like a brick compared to the other similar lenses from Nikon, Canon and even Pentax.
Its almost exactly (about 1cm shorter I think) the same size as the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC. The Nikon is 5cm longer and 250g heavier than the Tamron.The 24-70 VR is over 1KG - 'hopefully' this might be less. Looks quite compact compared to the Nikon too.
I do wish they'd come up with a modern version of the 100-300 F4 with stabilisation, I'd buy that as soon as it hit the shelves if it was anywhere near as nice as the old one.
The new Tamron lenses have a "dock" too.I still think the addition of a dock is a master stroke. All things being even between lenses of different brands, then it's enough to sway me towards sigma.
The new Tamron lenses have a "dock" too.
How do the Sigmas hold up agaunst general wear and tear? The surfaces look kind of prone to scratches etc?
@Sir SR How do you find the 50?
And huge and heavy ......
Downside is that it's expensive.
Well the 85 is around £1,200 I can't see it being any less than thatThe 135mm will be a good addition for Nikon shooters, be interested to see what price it comes in at.
I'm finding the 100-400mm a very odd lens too, relatively slow aperture. I'm sure Sigma have done their research but I do wonder who will choose this lens over the other options. I still wish someone would make a 400mm f4 for Nikon.
Well that's just realigning UK prices now exchange rates are much lower...Just a heads up folks, Sigma is raising prices come March 1st.
Probably looking at around a 20% hike so buy now if you can do so.
Correct, best to buy nowWell that's just realigning UK prices now exchange rates are much lower...
Yeah I get that but it's just that it's f6.3, I don't understand why they didn't make it f5.6. Yes it's only 1/3 stop but it's disappointing (IMO). Had it matched the Nikon I'm sure it'd be a clear winner, as it is I don't think they'll take as much of a chunk away from the Nikon sales as they might have done. But it's all just speculation on my behalfOne reason I can think of for the 100-400mm, is their giving an option to people who may find the 150-600mm too heavy? 100-400mm is a good option then for Nikon shooters as we don't have anything cheaper in this length (80-400mm Nikon is very expensive) and its a option over the 70-300mm providing it's not too heavy...... IIRC Canon have a 100-400mm lens which is also expensive.
If its a good lens they could possibly coin in.
Are exchange rates 20% lower?Well that's just realigning UK prices now exchange rates are much lower...
How much have the rates dropped?Well that's just realigning UK prices now exchange rates are much lower...
Yeah I get that but it's just that it's f6.3, I don't understand why they didn't make it f5.6. Yes it's only 1/3 stop but it's disappointing (IMO). Had it matched the Nikon I'm sure it'd be a clear winner, as it is I don't think they'll take as much of a chunk away from the Nikon sales as they might have done. But it's all just speculation on my behalf![]()
Well in June 2016 you got 1.45 dollars for every pound now you get 1.25 dollars for each pound. Closer to 15% admittedly, but the UK prices for some lenses have been relatively cheaper for a while e.g. Sigma 50mm Art is $950 (£805 once VAT and duty is taken into account) vs £600 UK price.Are exchange rates 20% lower?
Well the 150-600mm C was around £1200 on first release IIRC, so I wouldn't expect the 100-400mm to be under £500. However, they do have to bear in mind their own 150-600mm so maybe it will.To keep price down and be much cheaper than the others.
I just bought another Sigma C 150-600mm and it's now at £699.00, my other two were £739.00. You would expect this new one to be cheaper? For 100mm more than the 70-300mm I would expect this to be sub £500.00, but you never know with a new price premium.
It a lens which interests me due to my problems. I find my 70-300mm a tad too short when out, after using the 600mm at home.
Makes you wonder why Apple, Canon and Nikon raised their prices by 25-30% thenWell in June 2016 you got 1.45 dollars for every pound now you get 1.25 dollars for each pound. Closer to 15% admittedly, but the UK prices for some lenses have been relatively cheaper for a while e.g. Sigma 50mm Art is $950 (£805 once VAT and duty is taken into account) vs £600 UK price.
That's easy, more profitMakes you wonder why Apple, Canon and Nikon raised their prices by 25-30% then![]()