Merlin5
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,295
- Name
- Lee
- Edit My Images
- No
Hi guys. I've been reading an article about photographing tall buildings. It says to get dramatic clouds or to blur them, you need longer exposure, but that during daytime it's difficult not to over expose and blow out highlights. And so it said an ND filter is needed. The article goes on to say "We used an ND400 filter, which blocks out nine full stops of light. Once the filter is attached, you need to decrease the shutter speed until the exposure level indicator lines up with zero on the exposure scale." So, for my Canon nifty fifty, I'd need a 49mm filter. Do you recommend I get a 400 or some other number and any particular not too expensive one to get? Also, my Tamron lens would need a 62mm filter. At present, the only filter I have a is a Hoya Pro 1 circular polariser for the 50mm lens. But that isn't enough I guess for longer exposures.
The other question is this. I shot a photo yesterday of a very tall telecommunications tower with my 50mm lens. I stood right next to it and pointing up to the top of the structure getting some sky into the frame too at f/8. The photo came out nice and sharp along with blue sky and nice white clouds. But I could only get roughly the top half of the tower into the frame. I've been considering investing in a Tamron 17-35mm wide angle lens for general purpose landscape. But would a wide angle lens make any difference in how much of a tall structure can be captured if you're standing below it and shooting upwards? I'm guessing not because wide angled lens is presumably only for capturing more area left to right?
The other question is this. I shot a photo yesterday of a very tall telecommunications tower with my 50mm lens. I stood right next to it and pointing up to the top of the structure getting some sky into the frame too at f/8. The photo came out nice and sharp along with blue sky and nice white clouds. But I could only get roughly the top half of the tower into the frame. I've been considering investing in a Tamron 17-35mm wide angle lens for general purpose landscape. But would a wide angle lens make any difference in how much of a tall structure can be captured if you're standing below it and shooting upwards? I'm guessing not because wide angled lens is presumably only for capturing more area left to right?
Last edited: