As title, this may be of interest to some.
See https://www.cordbusters.co.uk/major-freeview-channel-numbering-shakeup/
See https://www.cordbusters.co.uk/major-freeview-channel-numbering-shakeup/
Changing any system like this takes years because you have to be sure the majority of customers' equipment can cope with the change. If that's not the case, you have to make the change an option and wait until a substantial majority of customers have replaced their equipment with the new standard, before you can begin the changeover.Surely channel numbers should be redundant. The interface of set top boxes feels positiviely archaic in this day and age.
Ofcom dictate which channels occupy Channels 1-5, I don't know about FreeView and other providers but certainly on Sky the TV companies pay a lot of money for channel number.We have Freeview on 3 different devices and it is a game sometimes as to whether the one that does its retune automatically has actually done it.
But the one thing that annoys me in regard to the channel numbering, is why the heck the various +1 channels are not the very next number or at least on the same 'page' of the EPG![]()
I still wonder why I have to have a TV licence, bearing in mind I do not watch BBC anymore. I keep getting the freeview messages, so will retune my receiver when they change. It never takes very long and you sometimes find new channels.
Getting back to the very first post about the over 75's now having to pay, I have to ask why not? IMHO, if they are in a position to pay, they should pay like the rest of us or not use the service...I am not sure why age alone should have a bearing on it?
If the the question is why there is a licence fee at all, that's a different debate, and something I question myself...
And that would be fine if this was just about the Beeb but it isn't as if you watch any live tv you have to pay the BBC licence fee. Why should I or anyone else pay the BBC money if we never watch it but do watch ITV or indeed any other live tv?
I'd very happily not watch the BBC and not listen to BBC radio and I'm sure there are many others who'd like the same. Let the BBC stand or fall without this BBC tax on non BBC live tv. It's like Tesco demanding a fee when I only shop at ASDA.
what are the rules for ditching the TV licence now adays?
I would say that's a different issue, and as such is pretty much how I feel about the licence over all too...
The Licencing say you have to have a licence to watch any "live" tv, which in their eyes constitutes any live broadcast from any channel, which can include repeats, highlights of sports which took place years/decades ago. I think you can ditch it, by watching Youtube channels, On Demand or Catch Up ( I do not know enough about these) and playing DVD's.
The BBC IMHO is a corrupt, monopoly of an organisation, which is no longer fit for purpose.
Fair points, but since the boxes are replaced, albeit infrequently, the replacement boxes could contain a new interface.Changing any system like this takes years because you have to be sure the majority of customers' equipment can cope with the change. If that's not the case, you have to make the change an option and wait until a substantial majority of customers have replaced their equipment with the new standard, before you can begin the changeover.
If somebody said to me they watch ITV and channel 4 but never BBC I’d take that claim with a very large pinch of salt...What's a different issue?
You don't just need a licence to watch the BBC, they demand you pay it if you watch live tv but never BBC. That just can't be fair.
TBH I'm all for defund the BBC for many reasons, this being one of them. It's like some North Korean thing... "Yes we know you never watch us but you watch someone else so give us your money."
If somebody said to me they watch ITV and channel 4 but never BBC I’d take that claim with a very large pinch of salt...
I was referring to your point “they demand you pay it if you watch live tv but never BBC” Note the word never.The last thing I watched was The Repair Shop but that's finished now. I recorded it and watched it later. I can't remember the last time I watched anything else. I do occasionally listen to BBC Radio but even that is much reduced now and I'd have no issue foregoing that dubious pleasure if needed. And I can't remember the last time I watched C4 either.
As to the fact that you don't believe me. I can live with that
Frankly I can't believe you watch the Beeb. Haven't you got better things to do?
The Licencing say you have to have a licence to watch any "live" tv, which in their eyes constitutes any live broadcast from any channel, which can include repeats, highlights of sports which took place years/decades ago. I think you can ditch it, by watching Youtube channels, On Demand or Catch Up ( I do not know enough about these) and playing DVD's.
The BBC IMHO is a corrupt, monopoly of an organisation, which is no longer fit for purpose.
so what if you just have amazon prime and netflix?
If somebody said to me they watch ITV and channel 4 but never BBC I’d take that claim with a very large pinch of salt...
I think you can watch them without a licence.
Getting back to the very first post about the over 75's now having to pay, I have to ask why not? IMHO, if they are in a position to pay, they should pay like the rest of us or not use the service...I am not sure why age alone should have a bearing on it?
If the the question is why there is a licence fee at all, that's a different debate, and something I question myself...