Thanks Mark, I wasn't aware of that system, I'll have a look.I tried various, but settled on the Kaiser system... It's fast to use and works very well but isn't cheap. 35mm up to 4x5 I believe.
View attachment 390887
Thanks Ian, that's good to know about the Pxltr. Which ever mask I get, I'm not going to sell my scanners 8100 and V500 until I've tried the digital camera approach and made a comparison.I tried the Pixlatr. Too much of a faff. Ended up selling it on. Good news is I didn't lose much, so it was worth a try for me.
The issue I had with it was that curly film was a real pain to work with. The 8100 I have does a much better job, and I have ANR glass for my V550 which is the perfect solution IMO. It may well be the best offering for DSLR scanning, but it wasn't satisfactory for me.
It would be good to hear your thoughts. After faffing around with backlights and tripod nonsense as well as the conversion from neg to pos, I decided against that method. It didn't help that I shoot 35mm, 6x6, 6x7, 645 and 6x17 so a mask device was never going to be perfect for me.Which ever mask I get, I'm not going to sell my scanners 8100 and V500 until I've tried the digital camera approach and made a comparison
Thanks for this, all add to the list to considerI found these work fine for 120 on a flatbed:
DigitaLIZA - Lomography
microsites.lomography.com
(...for the 2 frames a year I can be bothered scanning!)
Peter, Thats very generous. I'd be happy to pay the postage if it needs a good home!As an aside, I have a 6x6 medium format mask, actually an enlarger negative carrier, which I would be happy to pass on at no cost (I'll pay the postage). Its a very well made aluminium frame in two parts. Could also be used for contact printing perhaps, if you are into vintage type miniature contact prints. It has been sitting on my desk for weeks waiting for a new home. No idea which enlarger it fits and the only enlarger I ever owned was Gnome Beta so I'm pretty sure it didn't belong to that.