Lightroom or Photoshop

Lightroom or Photoshop

  • Lightroom

    Votes: 39 69.6%
  • Photoshop

    Votes: 17 30.4%

  • Total voters
    56

Philx1979

Suspended / Banned
Messages
987
Name
Phil
Edit My Images
No
Would like to find out what programs you use more of.

I currently use Bridge and Photoshop however i`m hearing friends are using Lightroom more these days as quicker and smoother workflow and use photoshop for more technical edits.
 
Last edited:
You might have added a third option for both.
I use Lightroom for the bulk editing, and Photoshop for the tricky stuff. I could live without Lightroom (at a push) but I couldn't manage without Photoshop, much easier with both though.
 
Use Lightroom, as it is adequate for my use, but do sometimes use Photoshop for very specific things that I'm unable to do in LR.

Lightroom 5's new features will hopefully mean even less usage, for me, for photoshop.
 
sorry i didnt put a third option in, i can seem to add that now.

Still the question/poll asks which do you use more of? and its seems both of you have said lightroom but photoshop for the tricky stuff, so that points that you use lightroom more.
 
Lightroom only, I am not a pro and LR does everything I need it to do..
 
LR4 90%

PE10 Most of the rest of the time.

Picasa now & again.
 
None of those...


Nikon Capture NX2 for 99% processing.
The occasional frame and/or text is done in Paint.net...
 
different tools for different jobs. Mainly LR5, but for merging multiple exposures (hdr/pano) I use PS.
 
I'm 95% LR 5%PS
I often go into PS just to have a play and learn/improve something, but find LR totally intuitive and rarely use it just for fun or experimenting
 
Lightroom mostly but usually end up in PS at some stage in post processing.
 
No option for both, so didn't vote.

They are different programs for different purposes. THey shouldn't really be compared to one another like this.

I use both.
 
Cannot vote as I use both.
 
To elaborate my workflow I as follows

Import into Lightroom and carry out RAW conversion and cropping before opening in PS to adjust Curves and sharpening.
 
Bridge for RAW files - then CS5 for fine tuning ;)

Les :thumbs:
 
Import with LR edit with CS, editing without using layers just doesn't work for me.
 
I was watching creative live the other day with Lesa snider talking about creative cloud

She was saying that Lightroom and Elements were all that most Togs ever needed even pro's

Ps was way over the top unless you're a graphic designer, save you money and only get Lightroom and Elements

H
 
Last edited:
I was watching creative live the other day with Lesa snider talking about creative cloud

She was saying that Lightroom and Elements were all that most Togs ever needed even pro's

Ps was way over the top unless you're a graphic designer, save you money and only get Lightroom and Elements

H



I'm not saying elements is terrible... but there's a great many things it can not do as well.
 
Last edited:
Using LR and PS, although right now I'm testing out C1Pro since the raw conversions in C1 are better out of the box and the catalog system suits my needs better.
 
it depends what you use the software for.

If I was a professional photographer and getting paid decent money for it then without question I'd get the full version of photoshop because it can just do more than anything else out there, but I'd still use lightroom as well. There are lots of free ones that are really good for example picasa and one I like pixlr-o-matic which I used for a few months before buying LR4 and PSE10.
 
Hi, Probably about half & half Lightroom 4 & CS6.
 
I was watching creative live the other day with Lesa snider talking about creative cloud

She was saying that Lightroom and Elements were all that most Togs ever needed even pro's

Ps was way over the top unless you're a graphic designer, save you money and only get Lightroom and Elements

H

Element's, I have used a year or two back ( Elements 9 I think) but quickly up-graded to CS5 as Elements is sadly lacking, when compared to the full version like CS5, in my opinion :shrug:

Les :thumbs:
 
As pointed out already above, this is not an "either or" situation. Unlike browser based programs, you choose which files to add to the LR catalog. The real power of LR4 as an image asset manager comes into play when you use the Filter bar to search for images in the catalog. Once you get into the habit of entering descriptive keyword information each time you import new photos, you will be able to search your archive more easily and more quickly than compared to a browser, file based system. Once you start to handle thousands of photographs, you may struggle to search through a hierarchical folder management system unless you know precisely in which folder they are stored.
Of course if you have relatively few photographs, then it is not an issue.
PSE11 is an excellent program and does most all of what the amateur requires for manipulating the image. However successive image adjustments in PS progressively degrade the image, whereas LR allows as many adjustments and changes as you wish, but only applies them as a single adjustment when you choose to edit in PS or export as a fixed-pixel image.
Once your photos are in LR, you have all the controls you need to carry out image edit selections, group and rename and make advanced Develop adjustments. When you're ready to take your photos into PS you can easily use the "Photo-Edit in APS" command.
As I don't need to photoshop every image I shoot, it follows that LR4 will be called on first to at least add the images into the catalog, so it will naturally be the most used.
 
Back
Top