Lens suitable for photographing buildings?

Or the 17mm TSE, might be better for indoors on a cropped body.
 
Rent a 24mm TSE.

Or the 17mm TSE, might be better for indoors on a cropped body.

+1 for a tilt/shift if you want the verticals straight.

Edit - ^^ if you're wanting to photograph whole buildings or facades ^^

If you're aiming to record architectural detail, that's different again. A better description of what you intend to be shooting would help. Reading back, the original post is hopelessly vague, "inside and outside shots", and very difficult to interpret for a definite answer.
 
Last edited:
As others have said rent a TS-E either 17 or 24 ( http://www.lensesforhire.co.uk/ are good- I rented a 24mm Mk 1 from them).
Check first that it will work on your camera,I have seen reports that the lens hits the on board flash housing before getting to max vertical shift.
A good tripod and a hot shoe level of some sort and you are good to go.
Dont forget that TS-E lenses are manual focus so its best to work with live view.
 
TSE lens, 24mm is usually fine and if more is required stitch the images together, inside same again but blend 3/4 frames together if there are windows in the images.
Light is crucial in architectural photography, check where the sun will be.
 
Rent a 24mm TSE.

Or the 17mm TSE, might be better for indoors on a cropped body.

Sorry I disagree, if the camera has DX sensor. They are definitely the #1 choice for FX sensor, maybe also add 14mm f/2.8 (14-28 for Nikon and correct in post).

For DX go with Canon 10-22mm, and do all perspective correction is PS or LR. 500D has more than enough MP for this. Shoot ISO 100 and the noise will be OK.
 
daugirdas said:
Sorry I disagree, if the camera has DX sensor. They are definitely the #1 choice for FX sensor, maybe also add 14mm f/2.8 (14-28 for Nikon and correct in post).

For DX go with Canon 10-22mm, and do all perspective correction is PS or LR. 500D has more than enough MP for this. Shoot ISO 100 and the noise will be OK.

If you want awful looking photographs for commercial work, yes of course, that's absolutely what you should do.
 
If you want awful looking photographs for commercial work, yes of course, that's absolutely what you should do.

We can argue on the degree of awfulness, but unless the OP switches to at least 5D, those 17mm and 24mm will be far too narrow for a lot of architectural work. Unsuitable is worse that awful in my books.
 
Got agree with a tilt and shift, but keep is small! I found the larger ones to not be that effective so far!

Regards

Chris
 
Back
Top