Lens extender

swiftflo

Suspended / Banned
Messages
1,336
Name
Peter
Edit My Images
Yes
I have been reading about lens extenders. If I use a 1.4x lens extender I read that my lens need to be stopped down a stop. As I shoot mainly in "Aperture priority" surely my camera will take care of this and I will have nothing to do, (or have I got this all wrong). Or are we talking about manual camera settings ?.
 
It doesn’t need to be, it is forced to. The min aperture of the lens will automatically be 1 stop slower. You don’t need to do anything.
 
Just make sure that your lens will accept a Teleconverter ( extender) not all lenses do and that your camera will retain autofocus with the the TC attached again that depends on the camera and the lens.
 
I have been reading about lens extenders. If I use a 1.4x lens extender I read that my lens need to be stopped down a stop.

The extender lets less light through to the sensor than the lens on its own, a stop less light with a 1.4x, but in practice you can ignore this if you are using the built in camera exposure meter.

However, the way you have phrased your questions "needs to be stoped down a stop" possibly suggests something else is being referred to.

Most extenders reduce optical quality, and its common to hear people say you need to stop the lens down a stop when using an extender, to try and recover some of this lost quality.

So with a 300mm f4, set wide open at f4 with a 1.4 extender, the light reaching the sensor will be a stop less than it would have been without the extender.

If you get a loss of quality at f4 with the 1.4 extender you may want to stop the lens down to f5.6 to recover the quality and choose to lose another stop of light in the process.

In both cases the camera meter will still be reading the amount of light that actually reaches the sensor, so you don't need to manually intervene.

Whether you "need" to stop the lens down, and by how much, will depend on your personal experiences with the lens+extender, and how you want to compromise between optical quality and using a higher shutter speed that might be needed to stop subject movement or camera shake.
 
Like @troutfisher says check a teleconverter will fit your lens. If it’s for the Fuji 55-200 in your bio a quick google search seems to say a teleconverter won’t fit your lens.

5 years ago I wrote a short guide for my website as it’s easier to link to the guide rather than repeat the info in it on multiple occasions. Maybe worth a quick read.


another point is do you really need a teleconverter? Could you crop instead? Of course cropping reduces file size but whether that’s only an issue really depends on what you do with resulting photos.

 
Last edited:
Another disadvantage which I have never seen mentioned anywhere is that the FPS rate drops when using a teleconverter. Not sure if this applies with all products but it certainly does with my Kenko x1.4.
 
Another disadvantage which I have never seen mentioned anywhere is that the FPS rate drops when using a teleconverter. Not sure if this applies with all products but it certainly does with my Kenko x1.4.
Never experienced that with mine on a d700 and sigma 70-200 or with my old Fuji 100-400 and 1.4tc
 
Like @troutfisher says check a teleconverter will fit your lens. If it’s for the Fuji 55-200 in your bio a quick google search seems to say a teleconverter won’t fit your lens.

5 years ago I wrote a short guide for my website as it’s easier to link to the guide rather than repeat the info in it on multiple occasions. Maybe worth a quick read.


another point is do you really need a teleconverter? Could you crop instead? Of course cropping reduces file size but whether that’s only an issue really depends on what you do with resulting photos.

Sorry my details are not up to date.Once again I have sold off the Fuji gear and gone back to a canon 5Div. (comes this time with a crane to lift it) lol.
 
Back
Top