leicas-what is it about them?

fontmoss

Suspended / Banned
Messages
1,227
Name
Dave
Edit My Images
No
Having never handled one or seen the results first hand, just what is it seperates leica as special? is it immediately apparent when you pick it up and start plugging away? and is there such a thing as a cheap one.....








im guessing 'cheap' for leica will mean 700 notes
 
is there such a thing as a cheap one....

Ahahahahahahahahaha, oh the naivity!!! :D

No, no such thing as a cheap one! Well maybe cheap relative to say, a house?!
 
Its like the difference between a Mazda and a Morgan sports car!
 
Having never handled one or seen the results first hand, just what is it seperates leica as special? is it immediately apparent when you pick it up and start plugging away? and is there such a thing as a cheap one.....






im guessing 'cheap' for leica will mean 700 notes

I've seen rough ones go for just over £100.....
 
No, no such thing as a cheap one!

ahem

im guessing 'cheap' for leica will mean 700 notes


Its like the difference between a Mazda and a Morgan sports car!

yeah but what makes it different, its clearly not a case of simply being nice, so what is it, in your individual opinions, that sets them apart
 
Having never handled one or seen the results first hand, just what is it seperates leica as special? is it immediately apparent when you pick it up and start plugging away? and is there such a thing as a cheap one.....


im guessing 'cheap' for leica will mean 700 notes

Dave...All of them are very well made cameras in allrespect.

I have a CL, which is just fantastic; it is small ( very pocketable), easy to use, great metering, and wonderful lens. ( I had a Leica Screw mount as well) and all of them just feel wonderful.

A Screw mount body + 50 mm lens is reasonable nick ( and not a collectors item) can easily be had for 175-250£

CL + 40mm can be had easily for 450-550£; I got mine for 350£. The 90 mm lens will be another 150-200£ ; I got mine for 60£

A M3 or M2 is a bit pricy; about 100 £ more. Both are built like a tank, but does not have metering.

Once you get into M6 and above, thats serious mioney ( as in 1000-1200£ for the body+ 50 mm lens)

The good thing though is, you can buy a cheaper body, such as CL and can use the latest lens.

Leica prices are very much influenced by the (i) collectors models ( best avoided) and (ii) ones in pristine condition ( best avoided, after all you want to use it)


And since they all hold their prices very well; you will not lose nore than 10% if you buy carefully
Ujjwal
 
Pah, Leica smecia, give my Canon any day!

:exit:
 
cool, where was that from ujjwaldey?

Dave, I guess you are asking where I got it from?

I got the IIIc from MWCLASSIC and the CL from a dealer in Devon.

MW usually have very good prices; and are very reliable and knowledgeable on Leicas. And very friendly as well; give them a call and talk to them ( 2 guys own the place) they will tell you what to get. You can also ask them whether they will buy back the camera if you dont like it - they usually do for a very good price

BTW : Have you used a RF before?

Ujjwal
 
Canon started by copying Leica:)


Dave.
 
think i bought a RF from you for my gf, ujjwaldey ;)

i shall investigate MW further cheers
 
Canon started by copying Leica:)


Dave.


Indeed Dave; and a poor man's copy at that. And had a funny name for a camera company : Kownoon... ( along with its best friend, who started by copying Leica's rival - Contax; and called themselves Nippon Kogakashu....:) )
 
think i bought a RF from you for my gf, ujjwaldey ;)

i shall investigate MW further cheers

You might want to buy a cheap RF; just to see if you like it. ( they can be had for as low as 20-30£). If you like the handling ( and some dont), then you can get a Leica....

Just an idea...

( P.S : If you talk to Mahendra or David, you can tell them I recommended you; it might ease the conversation)
 
I'd say more like a Mazda and Rolls Royce personally
(depending on which model of course) both get you from A to B but the Roller gets you there in style and comfort

Leica lenses give true sharpness as opposed to high contrast and perceived sharpness. The colour is fantastic too.

M6 with an 35f1.4 summilux :love:
 
Type in photographer into google. It should bring up Matt Stuart. Lovely work with a Leica.. I'm not at all jealous.....
 
As a leica owner, I would say build quality is the main pro with a leica body. Barely changed since the first part of the 20th century they are nearly all metal, so they are heavy, but they also rarely break. They feel quality, the paint work is matt, but has a silky feel to it.

They do not have a high quality metering system (on the M6 its a white spot painted on the shutter curtain that reflects light on to the meter cell), anything over a 135mm lens and forget about it, macro and realistically forget it, sports is also a bit of a fail.

What they do amazingly well is carry leica lenses, which are probably the best 35mm lenses available. They also carry Zeiss lenses, and relatively cheap but still very good Voigtlander lenses.

On balance, as long as you don't shoot super fast, far away or very close things, on 35mm film, the leica is the best tool for the job.

The M9 is arguably not up to the standards of modern DSLRs in terms of ISO, buffer speed, processing power, and costs abotu £7k, but it is the only full frame digital range finder currently available.

They are nice to have, but functionally limiting and extremely unadvanced. However if you are willing to live with all that, they are a pleasure to use
 
Back
Top