Last Stand Alone Version of Topaz Denoise Better Than Many?

[russellsnr]

Hi, just wondered if anyone else uses the last stand alone version of Topaz denoise?
Maybe it is my old eyes but I am seeing a better denoised image/s from that with the CLEAR or LOW LIGHT options on images with low ISO ranges (up to about 5000 ISO)
I have DXO pure raw 4 for higher noise levels along with L/R and P/S.
As I say maybe my old eyes but the images look cleaner and sharper.
Russ.

 

[LongLensPhotography]

It is definitely not bad with low light option and small numbers.

Lightroom is also very good now so really not much need to go there anymore. Notably lightroom really struggles with mini 4 pro and any other similar quad bayer sensor. They are s*** sensors after all

 

[welshwizard645]

I am using it, and in my most recent images I've used the software it has done a pretty good job on images taken at 1600-6400 ISO. I use it in preference to Adobe's software.

 

[russellsnr]

I am using it, and in my most recent images I've used the software it has done a pretty good job on images taken at 1600-6400 ISO. I use it in preference to Adobe's software.

Find it is a lot faster than Adobe's software on both L/R & P/S.

 

[the black fox]

Yea I still have it and sharpen as well , as stated faster than LR but if photo contains to many fussy parts artefacts are created . Best to use in moderation and as required

 

[mstphoto]

Good but I still think Pure Raw is better