Hi all,
Question for you all....
I have a client who wishes to have a series of prints for their longest bedroom wall. They'd like to split a single image into 4 A2 portrait prints which, when lined up, will form a sort of panoramic.
Now, my original RAW is 4368 pixels on the longest side so by my calculations, thats 1092 pixels per short side of A2 (being 16.55 inches) which means a print will come out at a mere 66dpi. Surely thats going to look shocking on a matt paper isn't it?
I know 300dpi is preferred, 200 acceptable but I've never printed nearly as low as this and am worried that it'll cost me more than the job is worth to give it a go. They will be looking at it from their bed, so probably be 5 or 6 feet away, but I don't like the idea of it looking appauling relatively close to....
What would anyone suggest I do? Upscale the image before printing? Just give it a go and see?
Cheers,
Andrew
ps. I also can't reshoot the landscape shot as the subject is at the other end of the country
Question for you all....
I have a client who wishes to have a series of prints for their longest bedroom wall. They'd like to split a single image into 4 A2 portrait prints which, when lined up, will form a sort of panoramic.
Now, my original RAW is 4368 pixels on the longest side so by my calculations, thats 1092 pixels per short side of A2 (being 16.55 inches) which means a print will come out at a mere 66dpi. Surely thats going to look shocking on a matt paper isn't it?
I know 300dpi is preferred, 200 acceptable but I've never printed nearly as low as this and am worried that it'll cost me more than the job is worth to give it a go. They will be looking at it from their bed, so probably be 5 or 6 feet away, but I don't like the idea of it looking appauling relatively close to....
What would anyone suggest I do? Upscale the image before printing? Just give it a go and see?
Cheers,
Andrew
ps. I also can't reshoot the landscape shot as the subject is at the other end of the country
