Harlequin565
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 8,684
- Name
- Ian
- Edit My Images
- No
Link to week 21 (page 12)
I've almost been losing sleep over whether I'll be able to manage this on a weekly basis. I had enough trouble with the Monthly competitions...!
But enough of that. I'm hoping this 52 will get me out with the camera a bit more, and more importantly, shooting with purpose.
I hope to comment on other people's 52's as well, although I'm not confident about passing critique on other people's work. If I don't like something, that doesn't neccessarily make it bad! Am hoping to learn how to critique with a bit more constructiveness (rather than just "good shot").
Lastly, I'm not setting myself any rules other than "try and follow the theme without using a crowbar". I'd like to shoot mono/duo-tone as I prefer that, and would also like to try and improve based on critique received.
Anyway. Curves... The Re-shoot!
1 pair of pink Coral eggs (we keep chickens). They were the cleanest eggs I could find. They were set in blu-tack on the kitchen counter (black flecked formica) with a piece of black card for a background.
Originally shot for a bit of fun last year, I wasn't happy with it. It was shot in natural light and therefore with a wide aperture (f1.8 on the 50mm). Because of the wide aperture, the rear egg was out of focus, so with this reshoot, I closed the aperture to f10 in the hope of getting everything in the same depth of field.
Unfortunately, that required 1/8sec at ISO400 (blurred shot even with IS), so I rolled out the flash and stood it on the counter top held up by a couple of jam jars at around 45 degrees from the subject basically trying to add fill in light where the window was not enough.
First shot was whiteout city, so I lowered the flash to 1/8 power and dropped the ISO to 100. Shutter speed set to 1/250sec. I was fairly happy with the outcome in-camera, so the wife got the kitchen back and I went to do some PP.
First thoughts upon opening was that a crop was required to remove the blu-tack holding the eggs up
Closer inspection of the images revealed that these eggs are very different from my attempts last year. The Whitestar eggs from last year were pock-marked and very obviously textured, which I liked, but these Coral eggs are not so obviously textured.
So rather than keep the pinkess of the Coral eggs, I went for a B&W conversion.
PP in short (about 15 minutes spent):
Crop to remove blu-tack & make it look more like a bum
Small amount of diffusion
Added noise (I like noise in some images - an having to use the flash meant a high in-camera ISO)
Levels & curves adjustment to increase contrast
Silver toning
And that's that. I may come back and reshoot again with a pair of Whitestar eggs if I get a really tough subject later in the year.
Lessons learned:
- First proper use of off-camera flash and balancing exposure with flash power and ISO.
- I like the final result, although I'm wondering if the PP was a bit too much. Adding diffusion after going to all the trouble to get a sharp shot seems to defeat the object..:bonk:
Please feel free to comment and I'll do my best to take a look and comment on some more 52's.
Cheers!
Ian.
I've almost been losing sleep over whether I'll be able to manage this on a weekly basis. I had enough trouble with the Monthly competitions...!
But enough of that. I'm hoping this 52 will get me out with the camera a bit more, and more importantly, shooting with purpose.
I hope to comment on other people's 52's as well, although I'm not confident about passing critique on other people's work. If I don't like something, that doesn't neccessarily make it bad! Am hoping to learn how to critique with a bit more constructiveness (rather than just "good shot").
Lastly, I'm not setting myself any rules other than "try and follow the theme without using a crowbar". I'd like to shoot mono/duo-tone as I prefer that, and would also like to try and improve based on critique received.
Anyway. Curves... The Re-shoot!
1 pair of pink Coral eggs (we keep chickens). They were the cleanest eggs I could find. They were set in blu-tack on the kitchen counter (black flecked formica) with a piece of black card for a background.
Originally shot for a bit of fun last year, I wasn't happy with it. It was shot in natural light and therefore with a wide aperture (f1.8 on the 50mm). Because of the wide aperture, the rear egg was out of focus, so with this reshoot, I closed the aperture to f10 in the hope of getting everything in the same depth of field.
Unfortunately, that required 1/8sec at ISO400 (blurred shot even with IS), so I rolled out the flash and stood it on the counter top held up by a couple of jam jars at around 45 degrees from the subject basically trying to add fill in light where the window was not enough.
First shot was whiteout city, so I lowered the flash to 1/8 power and dropped the ISO to 100. Shutter speed set to 1/250sec. I was fairly happy with the outcome in-camera, so the wife got the kitchen back and I went to do some PP.
First thoughts upon opening was that a crop was required to remove the blu-tack holding the eggs up
Closer inspection of the images revealed that these eggs are very different from my attempts last year. The Whitestar eggs from last year were pock-marked and very obviously textured, which I liked, but these Coral eggs are not so obviously textured.
So rather than keep the pinkess of the Coral eggs, I went for a B&W conversion.
PP in short (about 15 minutes spent):
Crop to remove blu-tack & make it look more like a bum
Small amount of diffusion
Added noise (I like noise in some images - an having to use the flash meant a high in-camera ISO)
Levels & curves adjustment to increase contrast
Silver toning
And that's that. I may come back and reshoot again with a pair of Whitestar eggs if I get a really tough subject later in the year.
Lessons learned:
- First proper use of off-camera flash and balancing exposure with flash power and ISO.
- I like the final result, although I'm wondering if the PP was a bit too much. Adding diffusion after going to all the trouble to get a sharp shot seems to defeat the object..:bonk:
Please feel free to comment and I'll do my best to take a look and comment on some more 52's.
Cheers!
Ian.
Last edited:


