Help - Results look like compact shots ¬¬

minkeypop

Suspended / Banned
Messages
74
Name
Nicky
Edit My Images
Yes
:help:
So basically i've had my SLR for a while now, and i'm getting frustrated with the results. I have a Canon 10D. I know that it's a fairly old model but surely the images should still be sharp?
I find that a lot of the pictures i take look like they have been taken on a compact. I know it's probably something i'm doing wrong, so any advice?
Would be much appreciated. :)
 
Hello Nicky

There can be quite a few reasons why your DSLR images don’t look ‘sharp’. But it’s rarely an issue with the camera or lens. But if the 10D has been very well used it’s not impossible. Is the problem there no matter what lens you use?

Camera-shake is a common cause of soft images, auto-focussing settings and methods that may focus on the wrong place is another. A high ISO setting can make a pic look a bit ropey, especially with earlier DSLRs.

The camera’s in-built JPG settings may possibly play a part, though this isn't a 'fault'. Not making good use of fundamental image-editing tools means your images may not get those enhancing tweaks they need, such as contrast and sharpening...

Anyway, I know the 10D is capable of excellent results so maybe even more practice would help you improve your technique. But if you can share a few pics and some 100% detail it would help us to understand what’s happening. Seeing what settings you used for images would be useful too – shutter speed, aperture, focal length, etc.

But don’t be disheartened! There are always reasons and solutions.
:thumbs:

Sam
 
If you can include the exif data in any shots you post, it would help:)
 
If you haven't already look through the tutorials section on here - especially the one on understanding exposure.
 
Nicky, the equipment used is only a small part of photography. While it is a cliche to say it, it usually is what's behind the camera that makes the difference. A snapshot will always be a snapshot, whether taken with the cheapest compact or the most luxurious DSLR, if no more thought and effort went into the creation of the image. Subject, composition, timing, lighting, background are all important and have nothing to do with the kit. The camera doesn't know where to stand, or whether to crouch or find an elevated position, or wait till sunset, or wait for a cloud to pass, or the wind to drop, or a wave to break, or when to release the shutter. It doesn't know what focal length to use either. Control of depth of field, motion, focusing also lie mostly in the skills of the photographer. Knowing how to meter and set exposure and trade off aperture vs shutter speed vs ISO are skills the photographer needs to have, not the camera. A superior camera can help out when it comes to dealing with fast action or dim light, and a good lens can help expand the creative options, but really there is not much that the camera is responsible for. Mostly it's what the photographer chooses to do with it.

Without seeing some examples, as has been requested, I doubt anyone can tell you where you might be going wrong.
 
Show us some examples.

Usually looking like P+S pictures is a composition/framing/DOF issue, not an equipment issue.
 
Agreed, I think if you believe your work looks like P+S then more than likely it is the following factors:

a)Composition
b)Subject Framing
c)Lighting
d)Depth of Field


Without examples of your work it would be hard to comment, but I suspect Composition and Subject Framing could be why you think your pictures look like point and shoot.
 
Are you using the camera in auto mode? That will very frequently give piccies like a p&s. As said before we need examples!
 
Sorry for the late reply, i've been away. And thanks for the replies, i appreciate it.
Here is an example from an airshow i went to this weekend.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/45286372@N03/4805310202/sizes/l/

Shutter Speed : 1/3000
Aperture: F/4.5
Focal Length: 220mm
ISO: 200

I took just over 1000 photo's and got a few that were actually decent. I know alot of it's just practise, but my god it's frustrating!
 
That looks like a focussing issue to me.
If you are focussing on a moving object you need to be using A1 Servo mode. Which is a tracking focus mode, which will track the object moving in the screen.

Usually it will be set to OneShot which means It'll focus, then beep. (once it has focus) but obviously once you press the trigger the plane has moved from where it last was when the camera said it was in focus.

Give the forum a search on A1 or AI Servo.

Hope That Helps :)
 
the camera seems to have focused on the right wing rather than the front of the plane but that may be whats thrown it a bit here, might be worth making it a tiny bit lighter in lightroom or other generic image manipulating software, might give it a bit more life, also slightly sharpen it then it could be a good image - hope you dont mind, i had a fiddle...

4805310202_45000b1c17_b.jpg
 
Nothing wrong with that one really apart from the subject not looking :P
There's some noise in the photo as you can see, but that's only because it's a really dark environment so the ISO will be really high to compensate for that.
Only way you could resolve that would be to use a flash really :s That would make your ISO drop a little.
 
The plane is not in focus. You were focusing in One Shot mode and letting the camera choose the focus point. Why? You have a subject approaching you. Why did you not use AI Servo focusing? Why did you not manually specify the focus point you wanted the camera to use?

Also, the shot is underexposed. 1/3000, f/4.5 and 200 ISO is insufficient for these overcast conditions. You should be at least 1/3 stop brighter, maybe a little more.
 
With regards to the sharpness issues, when I had my Tamron 70-300, although it could produce sharp images, with fast moving objects it struggled to lock on and maintain a sharp focus. Having upgraded to a Canon 70-200, it locks on so much more confidently, and stays locked on. The difference is night and day for me, so much so that, with af-servo on, shooting formula one cars at full pelt only required a single shutter actuation to a get a good shot. The af was THAT good. If your camera/lens produce sharp shots on motionless objects, I would suggest that the lenses ability to af-servo is not up to scratch for the subject matter.
 

dog on the floor shot - a couple of thoughts:

what is the minimum focus distance for the lens used ?

what were you intending to focus on? - "AFPoint: Auto AF point selection " - looks like it was trying for the closest paw. Perhaps you should be selecting the required focus point?​

bloomin difficult to get the photo lark right, isnt it ? :bang:
 
^^ good point. I dont ever usually stray from the centre point af since I discovered it after becoming wound up by random focusing.
 
For the dog shot you were shooting at 1600 ISO and 1/30. Well, 1600 ISO on a 10D is probably going to be noisy, as we can see, and noise reduction, if used, will result in some softening of fine detail as it endeavours to conceal the noise. But more importantly, I doubt very much that shooting at 1/30 is sufficient for a living creature that appears to be in the middle of some sort of manouevre. The paw looks fairly sharp, but that is planted firmly on the ground. The rest of the dog looks to be on the move, and I think your problem here is subject blur. Also, if you look at the carpet and try to identify the DOF you will see that it is very slender indeed, leaving you with no room for error on focusing, and unable to keep the whole of the dog's head sharp, never mind the entire animal.

Personally I think you could have done with more light, since the picture is underexposed as it is, pushing the envelope on ISO, has insufficient shutter speed and probably insufficient DOF. Obviously direct on camera flash would look like a disaster, so either use bounced flash or shoot in an environment with better lighting. You can see light streaming in from the left in the background, but you chose to shoot with the dog buried in deep shadow and facing away from what little light there was. Your white balance is off too. There was nothing here the camera could have done to save you.

I've tried to do a bit of a fix up on the dog, but it is not easy to deal with the problems in this photograph. Here's the before and after view, showing the adjustments I applied....

20100719_092601_.JPG



.... and here's the resulting photograph....

20100718_172521__LR.jpg



I think you should be glad that you used a 10D for this. I dread to think what the results from a compact would look like.
 
Back
Top