LizB90
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 51
- Name
- Liz
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi all,
I'm Liz, I'm 21 and live in Huddersfield, so ok that's the blind date bit over with. I have been interested in photography since the 90's with my miniature developing set as a child. Never did I imagine that I would be able to own my own camera, but yet here I am with my canon 1100D which ok is digital, but I think with moving with the times digitalisation was inevitable and has opened up a whole different range of media. As a novice I don't have a lot of experience and I am still very much a point and shoot type of photographer but obviously I hope to learn more about my camera and how to use it to its full potential.
I shall probably have lots of questions over the coming weeks, but one burning question I have is obviously I have the 1100D, which was recommended to me as a good starter camera, but since I've got it I've read some quite derogatory reviews of it and people almost pushing the 500/600D in its place. Is there any major reason for this? Or is the 1100D still a good starter camera and I shouldn't really worry about what I read.
Thanks for any hints and tips I might get along the way and obviously any welcomes,
Liz
I'm Liz, I'm 21 and live in Huddersfield, so ok that's the blind date bit over with. I have been interested in photography since the 90's with my miniature developing set as a child. Never did I imagine that I would be able to own my own camera, but yet here I am with my canon 1100D which ok is digital, but I think with moving with the times digitalisation was inevitable and has opened up a whole different range of media. As a novice I don't have a lot of experience and I am still very much a point and shoot type of photographer but obviously I hope to learn more about my camera and how to use it to its full potential.
I shall probably have lots of questions over the coming weeks, but one burning question I have is obviously I have the 1100D, which was recommended to me as a good starter camera, but since I've got it I've read some quite derogatory reviews of it and people almost pushing the 500/600D in its place. Is there any major reason for this? Or is the 1100D still a good starter camera and I shouldn't really worry about what I read.
Thanks for any hints and tips I might get along the way and obviously any welcomes,
Liz
