Harman Photo

Now that is interesting, I had forgotten that they had XP2 as a starting point which is of course a B&W emulsion, it will help to set the standards possibly to come. XP2 only has 1 sensitive layer so getting it to accept 3 layers is a task in itself. Does anyone know, if the orange mask used with conventional C41 is an additional layer or is the film base manufactured that colour. I have never actually thought about it before. So good luck to them
 
Quite possibly. Phoenix always was an ongoing project. With us as the guinea pigs.
 
LA95CEH.jpeg



The Harman Phoenix II ISO 200 120 Roll Colour Film is a premium medium format film that’s perfect for photographers who demand the highest quality in their work. With its refined tonal range, enhanced sharpness, and excellent exposure versatility, this film is tailored to deliver exceptional results with larger negatives that bring out unparalleled detail and color depth. With an ISO 200, it is perfect for daylight and well-lit scenarios, while also giving flexibility in slightly dimmer conditions. Depending on your medium-format camera, you can shoot in formats like 6x4.5, 6x6, 6x7, or even 6x9. The film features refined grain structure for smoother results while retaining sharpness and detail—ideal for enlargements or professional image production. Enhanced color accuracy and vibrancy, ensuring natural tones and a rich overall look, suitable for portraits, landscapes, or fine art. Extended dynamic range preserves intricate details in highlights and shadows, making it easier to capture images with more depth and balance. This film is designed for better results during lab scanning, achieving accurate tonal reproduction with minimal adjustments needed. The film is forgiving of slight overexposure or underexposure, empowering photographers to shoot in challenging lighting conditions without compromising quality. With a standard C-41 process, the film is compatible with almost all film labs worldwide. Quick and reliable development! This 120 roll film elevates the brilliance of color film by marrying improved technical performance with the innate qualities of medium format photography: stunning detail, depth, and dynamic range. Whether you're shooting studio portraits, travel scenes, or natural landscapes, this film ensures superior results that truly embody the beauty of analog photography.
Click to expand...

Product Features in Detail

Professional and Fine Art Photographers
The large negative size and incredible detail make it ideal for high-end professional work or fine art projects.

Landscape Enthusiasts
Medium format combined with ISO 200 captures the finest textures, tones, and vast scenes with unmatched sharpness.

Portrait Experts
The accurate color palette and smooth tonal transitions are fantastic for skin tones and creative portraiture.

Photographers New to Medium Format
The forgiving exposure latitude makes this film user-friendly even for those transitioning to medium format.
Click to expand...

Film TypeColor negative film
Format120 Roll, ISO 200
Exposure RangeBest results at ISO 200, but can be pushed to ISO 400
Tone ProfileWarm tones, punchy reds, rich contrast
GrainNoticeable but improved from the original Phoenix—more controlled and pleasant
DevelopmentStandard C-41 process
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Yep embargo lifted - anyone else interested enough to buy some? I might go for a role of 35mm and 120. Seems like some good improvements but also still some way to go, great to see the commitment by Harman
 
interesting...but I have soy much film in the fridge and freezer already!
 
Last edited:
lindsay said:
interesting...but I have soy much film in the fridge and freezer already!
Click to expand...


I wonder if soy (sauce) could be used as a developer like coffee can... (Semi serious as well as a gentle urine extraction!)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shoot Film Like a Boss has an interesting video on it.
 
Has anyone here dveloped the new Phoenix themselves? My results are, well, interesting. I've yet to scan, but the roll from the tank looks like it will be fun.
 
Ahah! My bleach was weak. I did a soak and rebleached and got clean results.
 
Taken with a Konica Z-up 70 Super - my son had it loaded before I could get it into something better.

Developed using the CS-41 method.
 
1753628384467.jpeg

Major hallation on the reflections .

I should really have used something with better optics. I'm looking forward to using the 120. In the meantime, I'm sure that some minor tweaks will reduce the colour cast.
 
NiallerM said:
View attachment 458952

Major hallation on the reflections .

I should really have used something with better optics. I'm looking forward to using the 120. In the meantime, I'm sure that some minor tweaks will reduce the colour cast.
Click to expand...
It looks a bit more conventional than the original version. Thanks for posting.

It will be interesting to see much, if any AH dye comes from the 120 in the pre wash.
 
zx9 said:
It looks a bit more conventional than the original version. Thanks for posting.

It will be interesting to see much, if any AH dye comes from the 120 in the pre wash.
Click to expand...
I'd say in general that's true (about being a bit more conventional). Not all of the photos have that blue cast, and I'm wary of drawing conclusions until I get a roll into a camera with a good lens. I'm itching for some 120. I think that MF will show it in a better light.

The pre-wash for this roll resulted in quite a cloudy tank of water.

Still, it developed pretty staightforwardly, and even tolerated my mistake with the blix. All I needed to do was to first put some of the developed leader through a second blix, before testing on a single frame. All was fine with the process. If anything, it might actual look a tad under-bleached, which is a look which I happen to like.

Next time I'll use better gear, though.

ETA: The water used for the pre-wash was quite yellow. Maybe the pre-wash wasn't needed.
 
Last edited:
The Oldun said:
I have one of those Z-Up 70s and, although it fell out of the ugly tree, the image quality is far better than the price would suggest.
Click to expand...
Aye. I was surpised to see what it could do. My only complaint was that when testing a film I should give it some better glass and ideally manual control.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top