Fuji XF 10-24 f4 R OIS

I think it's great. Sharp across the frame. If you are picky, you might see some minor reduction in quality at the edge, but that's only when doing some serious pixel peeping. These were shot with the Fuji XT3.

49840357016_87a7f0d074_k.jpg50061826441_4f375219c4_k.jpg
 
I enjoy mine too. As said, marginally soft at the edges and corners but I can't say I've ever put a part of the image that needs ultimate sharpness in those areas... Not light but quality lenses rarely are.
 
I had one before I sold most of my X kit to help with the purchase of my GFX kit, I found it very sharp and liked the results I got but always worried that it wasn't weather sealed. Jump forward I now have another X kit and have added the new 10-24. I'm happy with the new one and it has the added bonus of a hard stop marked aperture ring.

Holy Trinity.jpg
 
Last edited:
Topsy said:
I had one before I sold most of my X kit to help with the purchase of my GFX kit, I found it very sharp and liked the results I got but always worried that it wasn't weather sealed. Jump forward I now have another X kit and have added the new 10-24. I'm happy with the new one and it has the added bonus of a hard stop marked aperture ring.

View attachment 321173
Click to expand...
Have you noticed any difference between the old and new one in terms of picture quality. I bought the old one when fuji heavily discounted it around a year ago :)
 
Didn't know there was a new one TBH. Plenty happy with my "old" version.
 
Main difference with new one is weather sealing isn't it? I'm not sure that much else has changed.
 
gad-westy said:
Main difference with new one is weather sealing isn't it? I'm not sure that much else has changed.
Click to expand...
Weather sealing and the aperture ring now has numbers on it and hard stops at each end of the aperture range plus you no longer have to switch on and off the OIS it does it for you by Fujimagic.
 
Nod said:
Didn't know there was a new one TBH. Plenty happy with my "old" version.
Click to expand...
If I still had the old one I would probably not have "upgraded" but I sold my old one some time ago when I moved from X-Pro1s to Leica M9s. It wasn't until I bought my X-T2s that I though about a 10-24 again and just got the new one for the WR. I use my X-T2s as my all weather cameras so WR was important. I am fully WR with 3 bodies so no need even to change lenses when the conditions are bad.

L1010071.JPG
 
Last edited:
Like you, I have 3 bodies (actually, it's 4 now, I think!) with the 10-24, 18-135, 100-400 and one for primes. The 10-24 is on the X-Pro1 which isn't WR anyway. I tend to be even more of a wuss than my cameras these days - well, photographically, anyway. I don't mind me getting wet but don't really enjoy taking photos in the persisting rain
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top