First Rangefinder...

Apples and Pears! The difference between those two is much more digital vs film than anything else. If you don't mind which medium to use, I'd go for the R3A as it's a newer and less-cluttered design than the RD1. However as it's your first RF, would you learn quicker by using the instant results of digital? Your choice!
 
Not used the RD1 but I've had the Bessa R, R3A and R4A and they're cracking cameras, if you like your cameras to be purely manual then the R is an absolute bargain, if you prefer the option of some automation the the 3 and 4 will fit the bill, if you favour normal to short telephoto focal lengths then go for the 3A but if you tend to use wider lenses then go for the 4A.

All the Bessas are easy to use, small and light and hold their value well so if you decide the rangefinder isn't for you then you lose little or no money at re-sale.
 
The RD1 is digital, and the R3A is film as mentioned above. They look similar, the Bessas are really well-made. I own a R2M 250 anniversary, and a R2A. Cameraquest website has a lot of information on the Bessa range. The R2M/R2A has frame lines for focal lengths 35/50/75/90. I use 35mm, 50mm and 75mm lenses on them so its a perfect match. I currently have the R2A for sale in the classifieds, but will be keeping the R2M as its 1 of only 300 made! :)
 
I really enjoy using my rangefinder, but I'd go digital as the learning curve is brutal with them, especially if you've only ever shot digital before hand.
 
I'm not sure that I agree about the brutality... IMVHO they're simplicity itself to use. Anyone who can't work a RF out in 5 mins should maybe ask their nurse for help :D

I had a Bessa and they're beautiful things as are the lenses but another that I had that had its charm is the Canonet. They're a cheap way to try a RF and there seem to be plenty about at under £50.

Personally I'm done with RF's and film in general and although the RD1 tempted me a cheap MFT camera and old manual lenses are just as film like to use and a lot cheaper but I can see that RF attraction... :D
 
Its true that you can get to grips with them quite easily, yet you won't see the results with a film one until its developed. It took me a while to get use to my Leica M9's metering, as its centre weighted and can't be changed, meaning that I really had to understand my scene to ensure I was exposing what I actually wanted. Prime example is black dog on white bedding scenario. Atleast with digital you could check your exposure and retake the shot if necessary without literally wasting money on film. Suppose this also boils down to how much of a perfectionist you are, which is probably for another thread!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top