Finste
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 354
- Name
- Steven
- Edit My Images
- No
Hi,
After much mucking around I've decided to make a concerted effort to learn flash lighting. I've done the 'Strobist' stuff and I'm not too keen to the results. As a technique it seems more like a bag of tricks to me.
Anyways, I've read through this forum and have a question regarding fill-flash. In much of the excellent material Garry Edwards puts out, he states that fill should be on the camera axis, above or below the camera. (I think in one pdf he stated that if you do anything else you don't know what you're doing!). I get the principle of 'filling in the shadows' behind this idea but can't reconcile it to product photography where fill is from above and slightly behind. It can't see the shadows from the camera's point of view. Both can't be correct or is the former idea just a bit too strict?
I'm not trying to get at anyone here, just trying to understand fill flash for product photography that conflicts with what seems to be best practise.
Regards...
Steve
After much mucking around I've decided to make a concerted effort to learn flash lighting. I've done the 'Strobist' stuff and I'm not too keen to the results. As a technique it seems more like a bag of tricks to me.
Anyways, I've read through this forum and have a question regarding fill-flash. In much of the excellent material Garry Edwards puts out, he states that fill should be on the camera axis, above or below the camera. (I think in one pdf he stated that if you do anything else you don't know what you're doing!). I get the principle of 'filling in the shadows' behind this idea but can't reconcile it to product photography where fill is from above and slightly behind. It can't see the shadows from the camera's point of view. Both can't be correct or is the former idea just a bit too strict?
I'm not trying to get at anyone here, just trying to understand fill flash for product photography that conflicts with what seems to be best practise.
Regards...
Steve