I will have to search my Flickr to see if i have any on there -- I DID use some and the 800 ASA for local press work -- but I have DUMPED all my Press Negatives now I am out of work. It was very good and CHEAP! It was OK at 400 ASA when Fresh but if you get some NOW it will be outdated and need to be rated at 200 ASA.
Well I found the FG plus (either 100 or 200 iso) wasn't anything special over Kodak or Fuji and IIRC poundland used to sell it in the past my results showed more grain.
A pano h'mm seems everything is sliding to the left
I found TWO taken on the 800 ASA Solaris -- NONE with the 400 ASA -- all negs dumped . Salvation by Peter Elgar, on Flickr
The Salvation Army band playing in Brentwood High Street outside Marks and Spencers - they kept their eyes averted from the window display ! I used my newly aquired 'old' Pentax SV+ 24mm f3.5 SMC Takumar lens on the Solaris 800 ASA film.
I take it you've looked at the examples on Flickr to get an idea? I've just searched and found quite a lot of results. To me, the film looks pretty low contrast and grainy.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.