- Messages
- 11,274
- Name
- Asha
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I suspect this posting may have some experienced people rolling about laughing at my ignorance....please accept my apologies if it is a ridiculous question but if i don't ask then I won't know!
I have found some snippets of info on the internet regarding developing by inspection.
Sadly i do not have access to a darkroom....hence there lies a potential problem.
Saying that, I did read somewhere that a film could be developed in a tank ( in my case a patterson) and stop bathed at x amount of minutes, removed from the tank and inspected in a dimly lit room. I understand that the film will continue to develop until it is fixed but I presume only very slowly.
Assuming that the film can be inspected in this way and turns out to be under exposed, is it then possible to lengthen the developer time once replaced into the tank or will the stop bath have made this impossible.
I have found some snippets of info on the internet regarding developing by inspection.
Sadly i do not have access to a darkroom....hence there lies a potential problem.
Saying that, I did read somewhere that a film could be developed in a tank ( in my case a patterson) and stop bathed at x amount of minutes, removed from the tank and inspected in a dimly lit room. I understand that the film will continue to develop until it is fixed but I presume only very slowly.
Assuming that the film can be inspected in this way and turns out to be under exposed, is it then possible to lengthen the developer time once replaced into the tank or will the stop bath have made this impossible.