Box Brownie
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 17,645
- Edit My Images
- No
and please use their services
Copyright doesn't necessarily lead to remuneration!
- Thread starter Box Brownie
- Start date
ancient_mariner
Moderator
- Messages
- 27,773
- Name
- Toni
- Edit My Images
- No
I can't see stuff on FB but remuneration is a real problem for anyone creating work these days, and I suspect we'll see many arts being forced back into meatspace to function. Your post immediately made me think of this, and it was only the second video down when I opened YT.
I saw mention of this on FB and perhaps none too surprisingly it is not only photographers who can be affected by the cavalier approach to the value of creatives and the cost that goes into making the product.
Here is one musicians response to Spotify
www.facebook.com
Surely a musician has a choice as to whether or not his/her music is played on Spotify.
OP
Box Brownie
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 17,645
- Edit My Images
- No
@Eucris and @ancient_mariner
Yes, it is my understanding that musicians use the Spotify platform but my impression is that akin to the changes in the photo stock outlets that now in effect demean the creativity of photographers, the letter is critical of the CEO of Spotify in the same manner that the photographer community has rejected(?) stock!
Whether the writer is 'pi**ing in the wind against unstoppable changes is moot as sadly like microstock it seems the only winner is the platform???
Here is the letter Julian Costello wrote in the FB link above:-
"I am going to send this letter to Daniel Ek CEO of Spotify with my address etc added please like or forward if you can;
Mr. Daniel Ek Chief Executive Officer Spotify Technology S.A. 42-44 avenue de la Gare L-1610 Luxembourg
Dear Mr. Ek, I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the recent statement you made about the cost of producing music content, wherein you implied that creating music costs next to nothing. As a pr musician, teacher and subscription payer to you , I feel compelled to address this misconception.
Music production is a complex and labour-intensive process that involves not only the creative efforts of musicians but also the contributions of sound engineers, producers, artists photographers and numerous other professionals.
The creation of a single piece of music can take years of dedication, training, and financial investment.
The implication that music production is inexpensive ingnores the significant effort and resources that artists invest in their craft. Furthermore, the royalties that Spotify pays to musicians for the use of their music are currently derisory. These royalties contribute little to the livelihoods of the artists whose work forms the backbone of your platform.
While Spotify has provided unprecedented access to music for millions of users worldwide, it is crucial that the company also ensures fair compensation for the creators whose work makes this possible.
I urge you to reconsider the current royalty structure and to acknowledge the true value of the music and its creators. Fair and equitable compensation for musicians is essential not only for their survival but also for the continued growth and innovation within the music industry. Without adequate support, many talented artists may be forced to abandon their passion, leading to a less vibrant and diverse musical landscape.
I believe that Spotify has the potential to be a leader in advocating fair treatment and compensation for musicians. By investing in the well-being of artists, Spotify can ensure the sustainability of the music society as a whole and foster a more equitable relationship between the platform and its content creators.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my concerns.
I look forward to your response and to seeing positive changes that support the talented individuals who make Spotify's success possible.
Sincerely, Julian Costello"
Yes, it is my understanding that musicians use the Spotify platform but my impression is that akin to the changes in the photo stock outlets that now in effect demean the creativity of photographers, the letter is critical of the CEO of Spotify in the same manner that the photographer community has rejected(?) stock!
Whether the writer is 'pi**ing in the wind against unstoppable changes is moot as sadly like microstock it seems the only winner is the platform???
Here is the letter Julian Costello wrote in the FB link above:-
"I am going to send this letter to Daniel Ek CEO of Spotify with my address etc added please like or forward if you can;
Mr. Daniel Ek Chief Executive Officer Spotify Technology S.A. 42-44 avenue de la Gare L-1610 Luxembourg
Dear Mr. Ek, I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the recent statement you made about the cost of producing music content, wherein you implied that creating music costs next to nothing. As a pr musician, teacher and subscription payer to you , I feel compelled to address this misconception.
Music production is a complex and labour-intensive process that involves not only the creative efforts of musicians but also the contributions of sound engineers, producers, artists photographers and numerous other professionals.
The creation of a single piece of music can take years of dedication, training, and financial investment.
The implication that music production is inexpensive ingnores the significant effort and resources that artists invest in their craft. Furthermore, the royalties that Spotify pays to musicians for the use of their music are currently derisory. These royalties contribute little to the livelihoods of the artists whose work forms the backbone of your platform.
While Spotify has provided unprecedented access to music for millions of users worldwide, it is crucial that the company also ensures fair compensation for the creators whose work makes this possible.
I urge you to reconsider the current royalty structure and to acknowledge the true value of the music and its creators. Fair and equitable compensation for musicians is essential not only for their survival but also for the continued growth and innovation within the music industry. Without adequate support, many talented artists may be forced to abandon their passion, leading to a less vibrant and diverse musical landscape.
I believe that Spotify has the potential to be a leader in advocating fair treatment and compensation for musicians. By investing in the well-being of artists, Spotify can ensure the sustainability of the music society as a whole and foster a more equitable relationship between the platform and its content creators.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my concerns.
I look forward to your response and to seeing positive changes that support the talented individuals who make Spotify's success possible.
Sincerely, Julian Costello"
Last edited:
ancient_mariner
Moderator
- Messages
- 27,773
- Name
- Toni
- Edit My Images
- No
They probably do, but it's a bit like a musician having a choice about whether their music was played on the radio. You could stop it happening, but that gives you even less coverage.