Phase one just released the new version of capture pro one.
https://www.phaseone.com/en/Products/Software/Capture-One-Pro/Highlights.aspx
https://www.phaseone.com/en/Products/Software/Capture-One-Pro/Highlights.aspx
and please use their services
capture pro one 9 released
- Thread starter hsp70
- Start date
Kodiak Qc
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 20,285
- Name
- French Canadian living in Europe since 1989!
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I don't use any Abobe products anymore…
and if at twice the price for something "X" times better… it's a deal to me!
I downloaded version 9…
For my publishing work, a dream engine and so much more control and
souplesse! This v.9 is… well, just try it… it's free! but I bought it.
Kodiak Qc
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 20,285
- Name
- French Canadian living in Europe since 1989!
- Edit My Images
- Yes
•
YES! …among other things…
I dig the way contrasts treats saturation…among other things…
Have a good time!
david357
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 3,024
- Name
- Umm......................
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I guess for the low price version of pro for Sony cameras, it would be silly not to give it a try.
Any Sony users here that have compared it to Adobe's offerings, and what are your opinions please?
Thanks.
Any Sony users here that have compared it to Adobe's offerings, and what are your opinions please?
Thanks.
christurbo
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 281
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I'm thinking about moving to C1 from LR5, any experiences...? Is it speedier? What's looking at 1:1 like?
Denyerec
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 946
- Name
- Denyer
- Edit My Images
- No
Every other tool on the market is faster than Adobe Lightroom, it's literally the slowest available - which is why I jumped to Capture One to try it out. (http://petapixel.com/2015/10/13/lightroom-import-is-600-slower-than-competition/)
However without LAB colour readouts, my workflow is still stuck as Photomechanic -> Raw Converter -> Photoshop , it sure would be nice to be able to sort the colour out accurately in Capture One, but for now they seem determined to keep that an impossibility.
However without LAB colour readouts, my workflow is still stuck as Photomechanic -> Raw Converter -> Photoshop , it sure would be nice to be able to sort the colour out accurately in Capture One, but for now they seem determined to keep that an impossibility.
Kodiak Qc
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 20,285
- Name
- French Canadian living in Europe since 1989!
- Edit My Images
- Yes
•
+1
Kodiak Qc
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 20,285
- Name
- French Canadian living in Europe since 1989!
- Edit My Images
- Yes
•
… and with v9, a layer mask may be moved!!!
christurbo
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 281
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I love the speed of C1 however I suppose the workflow of LR has been embedded in me where I can work through an image very quickly. I won't give up... Yet!
Kodiak Qc
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 20,285
- Name
- French Canadian living in Europe since 1989!
- Edit My Images
- Yes
•
You will discover that your approach in CO will be simpler and faster
once the nasty habits of LR will have vanish from your blood stream!
ancient_mariner
Moderator
- Messages
- 27,780
- Name
- Toni
- Edit My Images
- No
I use LR 5.7, DXO Optics Pro 8 and occasionally Capture One (last Sony version).
DXO is terribly slow - several times slower than LR in all respects, though I understand version 10 is comparable. CO is about the same, though I've never done lots of extensive editing with it like I have with LR (brush work) so don't know if it will slow down like LR can on a low-spec machine.
All 3 handle RAW files differently and produce subtly different output. DXO tends to give images of high sharpness, sometimes with artefacts, subtle colours and slightly compressed tonal range, and in version 8 is poor at dust spot removal. LR images are less sharp, but often brighter and bolder, and over-cooking dynamic range compensation will result in fringing and halos, but the spot removal, gradient, brush, alignment and HSL tools are really excellent. CO falls between the 2 for image quality, with the structure tool being good for sharpness and also offering good tonal range control. I find that images processed in LR also work well for external processing in On-One's photosuite, whereas images processed in DXO sometimes start showing intrusive artifacts, especially if sharpened moderately.
For cataloguing I find LR to be most intuitive. DXO is so slow it's hopeless anyway, building image previews from scratch every time a folder is opened. CO I could probably live with, but I LIKE Lightroom.
DXO is terribly slow - several times slower than LR in all respects, though I understand version 10 is comparable. CO is about the same, though I've never done lots of extensive editing with it like I have with LR (brush work) so don't know if it will slow down like LR can on a low-spec machine.
All 3 handle RAW files differently and produce subtly different output. DXO tends to give images of high sharpness, sometimes with artefacts, subtle colours and slightly compressed tonal range, and in version 8 is poor at dust spot removal. LR images are less sharp, but often brighter and bolder, and over-cooking dynamic range compensation will result in fringing and halos, but the spot removal, gradient, brush, alignment and HSL tools are really excellent. CO falls between the 2 for image quality, with the structure tool being good for sharpness and also offering good tonal range control. I find that images processed in LR also work well for external processing in On-One's photosuite, whereas images processed in DXO sometimes start showing intrusive artifacts, especially if sharpened moderately.
For cataloguing I find LR to be most intuitive. DXO is so slow it's hopeless anyway, building image previews from scratch every time a folder is opened. CO I could probably live with, but I LIKE Lightroom.